There’s so much wrong with this article. It’s such shoddy journalism.
Firstly, inpatient care of children with mental health conditions is still a thing. There are many inpatient units around the world.
Second, neither the subject of the article, nor the journalist has confirmed if he was actually one of the subjects in the paper. It’s just assumed because of similarities. Despite this glaring possibility of error, the article was published anyway.
It’s also based on recollection of events from someone who was 10, 50 years ago. No verification of events has been done.
It also says the National Association of Practising Psychiatrists guidelines rely “heavily” on the paper in question. So I looked them up.
https://napp.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Managing-Gender-Dysphoria-in-Young-People-–-The-NAPP-Guide-17thAug22.pdf
The paper in question is just one reference of many in guidelines that describe exploring a child’s identity without pressure, not remotely anything to do with “conversion therapy” at all and the guideline in no way “relies heavily” on that paper.
The paper very clearly delineates what its intentions are.
Psychotherapy for gender dysphoria in children and adolescents is a respectful, supportive and exploratory process that does not seek any particular outcome in relation to gender identity or sexual orientation. It seeks to understand the nature and meaning of the young person’s gender distress and the context in which it has arisen. Psychotherapy addresses the multiple factors that contribute to the young person’s difficulties, helping to address issues that resolve distress and support ongoing development and maturation. Conversion therapies, on the other hand, aim to achieve a pre-determined outcome, such as gender normativity or heterosexual orientation. Psychotherapy for gender dysphoria must NOT be conflated with conversion therapies.
It’s a hit job article. It’s basically trying to say something that possibly happened to someone 50 years ago that sounds plausible but hasn’t been verified is being encouraged to happen again, when it blatantly isn’t when you read the document itself.