Rather nasty comment piece here from Ian Birrell - behind a pay wall though:
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/an-academic-an-arrogant-minister-and-a-fight-for-equality-that-has-gone-horribly-wrong-3840962
I’ve copied some of it below:
Sadly, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has come to be seen as a partisan in this battle. Its chair, Kishwer Falkner, took a tough line in response to the Supreme Court’s April ruling that legal definition of a woman refers only to biological sex, furthering the fissures on this issue.
She insisted this meant trans women could not participate in women’s sport, use female changing facilities or be treated on single-sex wards — although former Supreme Court judge Jonathan Sumption is among many arguing that it is a misreading of the ruling to suggest trans women must be excluded from single-sex spaces. Now the EHRC is drawing up guidance for public bodies after a surprisingly short consultation of just six weeks.
How can this view square with a parent who will be using carers for their DC? https://unherd.com/2019/10/how-my-daughter-disrupted-my-politics/
Why can’t (mainly) men (NAMALT) understand that a right to single sex carers does not in of itself create toxic divisions etc. What creates toxic divisions is men demanding that they are allowed to/cannot be prevented from caring for women and girls who do not/whose parents do not want this??