Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Pluvia · 20/07/2025 12:17

Helleofabore · 19/07/2025 16:37

What is going to make people feel secure and happy in the world when they are fully supported in believing a philosophical belief is material when it isn’t and can never be objectively real? Then you add in the spreading narrative that those who believe the material and proven facts that disprove that philosophical belief hate you and don’t want you to exist and you have a ready made mental health issue within society.

I think this question should be asked on a frequent basis :

“Should a psychological idea take precedence over a physical fact?”— Dr. Paul McHugh, Distinguished Services Professor, Johns Hopkins University School of Medical

Just spotted this. Brilliant, @Helleofabore , I'm cutting and pasting for future use if that's okay with you?

OP posts:
CagneyNYPD1 · 20/07/2025 12:22

guinnessguzzler · 19/07/2025 15:42

It's just so desperately sad, isn't it? My hubby is a bit of a be-kinder but one of the main things that has really got through to him is highlighting the mental health aspects because it's just so obvious, especially if you know people in this position, as he does. And no, it's not that their mental health is poor because of the way society treats them. And while we're all focusing on hormones and pronouns and all the rest, what actual support are people getting? Nothing that will really help and yet the NHS are off the hook because they use the right lanyards. It's a massive red herring for so many young people, particularly young women, who actually need real support. It makes me sad and furious in equal measure.

I could have written your post word for word. It makes me so sad and angry that a young person in our family didn’t get the mental health support they needed in their early/mid teens. And now, nearly 10 years on, they live in this grey space where they are still trying to decide who they are. Meanwhile, so much life and potential happiness has been passing them by.

Helleofabore · 20/07/2025 13:15

Helleofabore · 19/07/2025 16:37

What is going to make people feel secure and happy in the world when they are fully supported in believing a philosophical belief is material when it isn’t and can never be objectively real? Then you add in the spreading narrative that those who believe the material and proven facts that disprove that philosophical belief hate you and don’t want you to exist and you have a ready made mental health issue within society.

I think this question should be asked on a frequent basis :

“Should a psychological idea take precedence over a physical fact?”— Dr. Paul McHugh, Distinguished Services Professor, Johns Hopkins University School of Medical

I am going to add to this. Inspired by Suggestion’s links which try to leverage legitimate claims about laws banning same sex marriage to make a case for people with transgender identities being discriminated against in law.

If groups in society tell a group of people that they are being discriminated against because of legitimate concerns about extreme body modifications that may be life limiting and shortening to make a person’s body fit their philosophical belief about themselves this is not going to improve their mental health. If groups then, through fallacious comparisons (including by academics) equate that legitimate concern with historical illegitimate discrimination, how the fuck do you (general you) expect that group’s mental health to improve?

Of course, one of the way is for society to just give the group what the group demands. But the analysis is showing that this doesn’t prove long term mental health.

But those who are entrenched in supporting that this group’s philosophical belief should be prioritised in laws and policies over material fact based on established science, will not acknowledge the failure to provide evidence of the mental health aspects long term.

They will however try to politically leverage any other group they can in support.

guinnessguzzler · 20/07/2025 13:21

So sorry to hear that @CagneyNYPD1 and I hope they do manage to get the support they need and find a way to being happy one day.

DeanElderberry · 20/07/2025 14:49

suggestionsplease1 · 19/07/2025 17:11

Well, quite simply, the people who show prejudicial attitudes and behaviours towards LGB populations are also very likely to be those that show prejudicial attitudes and behaviours towards trans populations, because those prejudices tend to stem from similar underlying beliefs about gender roles and expectations, and a discomfort with those who deviate from those norms.

They're really not bothering to stop and enquire if a person happens to be T or LGB

poppycock

usedtobeaylis · 20/07/2025 14:56

guinnessguzzler · 19/07/2025 15:42

It's just so desperately sad, isn't it? My hubby is a bit of a be-kinder but one of the main things that has really got through to him is highlighting the mental health aspects because it's just so obvious, especially if you know people in this position, as he does. And no, it's not that their mental health is poor because of the way society treats them. And while we're all focusing on hormones and pronouns and all the rest, what actual support are people getting? Nothing that will really help and yet the NHS are off the hook because they use the right lanyards. It's a massive red herring for so many young people, particularly young women, who actually need real support. It makes me sad and furious in equal measure.

I wish I could find this because I haven't been able to for a while, but there was a study done on self-ID in one of the Scandinavian countries, this must have been way back in at least 2018. It was a small study, and it showed that self-ID done absolutely nothing to improve the quality of life for 'gender diverse' (hate that term tbh) people. All the issues such as discrimination in employment and housing, access to mental health services etc, it was all still there just the same and self-ID didn't improve anything. It didn't even function as a hammer for social acceptance. It was just a big performative nothing.

It's clear to see that in the UK it's the same, with the added bonus of being a cash cow for lobby groups who have led this group of people up the garden path.

usedtobeaylis · 20/07/2025 14:58

suggestionsplease1 · 20/07/2025 09:36

Your original analysis is fundamentally flawed as it pretends that non binary identifies are a recent trend, rather than an enduring expression throughout history and cultures.

Any point you make subsequent to that is not valid as it it predicated on a flawed premise.

Non binary identities right now are primarily a political identity.

usedtobeaylis · 20/07/2025 15:00

suggestionsplease1 · 19/07/2025 17:11

Well, quite simply, the people who show prejudicial attitudes and behaviours towards LGB populations are also very likely to be those that show prejudicial attitudes and behaviours towards trans populations, because those prejudices tend to stem from similar underlying beliefs about gender roles and expectations, and a discomfort with those who deviate from those norms.

They're really not bothering to stop and enquire if a person happens to be T or LGB

This doesn't seem to allow for feminist discomfort with the gender rules, roles and stereotypes that trans people are exemplifying.

mumda · 20/07/2025 16:51

Wrong thread

GermaineBloodyGreer · 20/07/2025 17:25

suggestionsplease1 · 20/07/2025 09:36

Your original analysis is fundamentally flawed as it pretends that non binary identifies are a recent trend, rather than an enduring expression throughout history and cultures.

Any point you make subsequent to that is not valid as it it predicated on a flawed premise.

How tediously predictable.

You're doing it again. You've now responded to several of my points without engaging with any of them, and you've been doing it since the first question was posed to you: 'What do non-binary identities have to do with prejudice and stigma that gays and lesbians face?'

You've now pivoted multiple times; first to unsupportive environments for LGB individuals, then to generalised prejudice, and now, apparently, to anthropology.

This thread is about the reported mental health outcomes of people identifying as 'non-binary' in contemporary Scotland drawn from 2022 census data. That is the scope. Your invocation of supposed 'enduring expressions throughout history and cultures' is entirely irrelevant to the subject. It contributes nothing to the question of whether this modern identity category warrants political equivalence with sexual orientation, nor does it demonstrate that the factors affecting gay and lesbian mental health can be meaningfully extrapolated to 'non-binary' individuals.

We are not discussing historical 'third gender' variance of indigenous or pre-modern societies. It's entirely irrelevant, but again, pivoting appears to be your MO.

If you have a coherent response to the points actually raised, I'll read it. If not, you're welcome to continue treating this discussion as an improv class in derailment and intellectual laziness.

GermaineBloodyGreer · 20/07/2025 17:40

Helleofabore · 20/07/2025 09:43

Are we seeing another thread where the plight of historic people in homophobic and sexist cultures are being politically leveraged to support a modern day group of people with a philosophical belief that doesn't reflect material reality?

Exactly, and kudos to you for pointing this out. So many of these 'third gender' roles Western queer theorists continuously bang on about and romanticise were not expressions of some prelapsarian gender utopia; they were mechanisms; cultural adaptations to make, for example, homosexual male desire intelligible and acceptable in societies where explicit homosexuality was stigmatised or forbidden outright.

Helleofabore · 20/07/2025 18:15

GermaineBloodyGreer · 20/07/2025 17:40

Exactly, and kudos to you for pointing this out. So many of these 'third gender' roles Western queer theorists continuously bang on about and romanticise were not expressions of some prelapsarian gender utopia; they were mechanisms; cultural adaptations to make, for example, homosexual male desire intelligible and acceptable in societies where explicit homosexuality was stigmatised or forbidden outright.

Indeed. It has been discussed on so many threads now. It is always good to point it out because some people will believe it otherwise.

It was a rather refreshing moment when the prime minister of Samoa clarified that yes, the Fa'afafine are male and that he would not support them playing in female sporting events.

Helleofabore · 20/07/2025 18:30

Helleofabore · 20/07/2025 07:48

"I mean this is hardly surprising, and replicates the same international findings, that mental health in LGBTQ populations is poor for those in unsupportive environments with high levels of prejudice and stigma, but improves with higher levels of social support.
https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-023-05202-z

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00201-9

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-16034-7

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382043743_Community_belonging_and_acceptance_is_this_the_antidote_to_shame_and_societal_discrimination_An_exploration_of_LGBTQ_individuals'_attendance_at_pride_and_their_mental_health

https://time.com/6972292/anti-lgbtq-policies-have-an-alarming-effect-on-youth-mental-health/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08862605221108087

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266723003122 "

Would you like to talk us through each of these studies rather than doing your usual just plonking what you have googled onto a post?

For instance, why do you feel the experience of homosexual and bisexual people in China, a country which has been well publicised for its poor human rights record, is comparative to non-binary people in Scotland who have access to a great deal of support? Or was it just that it discussed 'minority stress' and you felt you could leverage that to make it relevant?

https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-023-05202-z

Can you please provide an accessible link for this paper, or are we just to make assumptions from the first one and a bit paragraphs?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00201-9

And of course a group who has been affirmed, meaning that they have received positive attention, including special days just for them to be celebrated are going to feel affirmed and happy as per this link. I doubt that any one would have felt that this hypothesis would be disproved. However, that the paper discusses the 'affirmation of identities' for 'cisgender' people leaves this paper rather lacking in clarity.

What is a cohesive cisgender identity that all these people share to be grouped as such? Because reading this study, it hasn't provided definitions and then it briefly posits that some 'cisgender' males feel less affirmed because of their 'feminine' presentation and that might be the reason that cisgender males have poor mental health compared to that group who has been affirmed.

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-16034-7

And I don't think that this paper below can be considered to be anything but a collected of positive attitudes towards Pride. It was a self selecting group at 7 Pride events which means collecting the feedback at a time when there is also maximum positive feelings about the event. There was no intention of finding out what Pride means to LGBT+ people who did not attend those Pride events. Can you explain why this paper is to be considered anything other than the collecting of positive experiences?

Do you think this should be considered a paper that describes the general population of LGBT+ people? Why?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382043743_Community_belonging_and_acceptance_is_this_the_antidote_to_shame_and_societal_discrimination_An_exploration_of_LGBTQ_individuals'_attendance_at_pride_and_their_mental_health

Why does this Trevor Project survey keep being presented as evidence to support affirmation to prevent suicide? Surely by now it has been regarded as misleading ?

https://time.com/6972292/anti-lgbtq-policies-have-an-alarming-effect-on-youth-mental-health/

Why have you attempted to leverage the experience of people with same or both sex orientations that are not heterosexual to support those of non-binary people? There is a segment of people who are non-binary who will fit into this group but why are you leveraging the axis of sexual orientation to explain generalised experience of people with transgender identities?

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08862605221108087

This final review is just another that attempts to measure the issues faced by two different groups. How can this study develop an accurate understanding when it is looking at issues such as 'laws and policies' of the two groups. What laws and policies in the USA are discriminating against people who are same sex or both sex attracted?

It starts off with this:

'In terms of measurement types, 58 (59%) of 98 studies measured LGBTQ+ structural stigma via either a single law or policy (eg, constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage, lack of a law requiring access to transgender-related medical care) '

Can you please point out why these two issues above should be considered together for the purpose of evaluation? One, banning same sex marriage, is an established illegitimate discrimination, and the other is a demand that is unsupported by evidence.

And by the way, Pachenkis is one of the authors of this paper was forced to correct his conclusion in a paper that attempted to state that transgender affirming health care treatments improved patient's mental health. Surely, you checked the authors of the papers you have linked to support your post?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266723003122

I don't believe anyone denies that people with transgender identities have poor mental health. However, I would disagree that simply affirming someone's philosophical belief as if it is materially real is going to lead to long term improvement of mental health. And I would also disagree that short term improvement of mental health should be considered the ideal, to the detriment of long term mental health considerations.

Does it not concern you that your links don't discuss the long term mental health improvement of the group of people the OP refers to? And does it not concern you that LGB people are being politically leveraged by people with transgender identities who may not be LGB at all?

Just to add also, that of course when support groups over sell privileges to people as ‘human rights’ the cruelty becomes very apparent. But it is not the cruelty of those denying those privileges.

The cruel act is that groups supposedly caring for the needs of that group have deliberately over reached and told them that those privileges are human rights.

Helleofabore · 24/07/2025 22:08

i think this study might give another perspective here to this thread.

From a mental health point of view, there are a few considerations. Poor mental health could, of course, cause a person to become a bully. Plus no doubt the lack of appropriate mental health care because there is a focus on affirming a particular group’s identity can result in ongoing and long term poor mental health.

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612424/full

Transgender Identity Is Associated With Bullying Involvement Among Finnish Adolescents

January 2021

Background: During adolescence, bullying often has a sexual content. Involvement in bullying as a bully, victim or both has been associated with a range of negative health outcomes. Transgender youth appear to face elevated rates of bullying in comparison to their mainstream peers. However, the involvement of transgender youth as perpetrators of bullying remains unclear in the recent literature.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare involvement in bullying between transgender and mainstream youth and among middle and late adolescents in a general population sample.

Methods: Our study included 139,829 students in total, divided between a comprehensive school and an upper secondary education sample. Associations between gender identity and involvement in bullying were first studied using cross-tabulations with chi-square statistics. Logistic regression was used to study multivariate associations. Gender identity was used as the independent variable, with cisgender as the reference category. Subjection to and perpetration of bullying were entered each in turn as the dependent variable. Demographic factors, family characteristics, internalizing symptoms, externalizing behaviors, and involvement in bullying in the other role were added as confounding factors. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are given. The limit for statistical significance was set at p < 0.001.

Results: Both experiences of being bullied and perpetrating bullying were more commonly reported by transgender youth than by cisgender youth. Among transgender youth, all involvement in bullying was more commonly reported by non-binary youth than those identifying with the opposite sex. Logistic regression revealed that non-binary identity was most strongly associated with involvement in bullying, followed by opposite sex identity and cisgender identity. Transgender identities were also more strongly associated with perpetration of bullying than subjection to bullying.

Conclusion: Transgender identity, especially non-binary identity, is associated with both being bullied and perpetrating bullying even when a range of variables including internal stress and involvement in bullying in the opposite role are taken into account. This suggests that bullying during adolescence may serve as a mechanism of maintaining heteronormativity.

Here is Colin Wright’s thoughts about the study.

https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/new-data-flips-the-transgender-bullying

Frontiers | Transgender Identity Is Associated With Bullying Involvement Among Finnish Adolescents

Background. During adolescence, bullying often has a sexual content. Involvement in bullying as a bully, victim or both has been associated with a range of n...

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612424/full

New posts on this thread. Refresh page