Well my son has been taught by a transperson. I didn't stop it. I don't think activism in schools and educational settings is appropriate though. That includes saying some is a woman when they are clearly a man and vice versa. The trans person is there to teach, not politicise. Schools are legally not permitted to politicise too. So it's a relevant criticism.
Children who are labelled as trans from age 4 ARE being abused by authorities and parents because that child does not have capacity to understand.
Pronouns are toxic and not a neutral thing. You can ignore pronouns. People - including non trans people - who are activists about forcing others to also do it are going too far and are overstepping at work. You can be employed without politicising your workplace. Activism in the workplace causes conflict - it doesn't matter what the cause.
Boycotts of companies who are acting in ways which are anti-womens rights and may have unlawful equality policies is the choice of a consumer. Being pro women's rights is NOT anti-trans.
Being pissed off at Bergdorfs previous employer for not doing due diligence on Bergdorfs is fair game given Bergdorfs comments which are out of line with child safeguarding and it's relevance to the said job role.
Generalising activists who are at a protest as fetishists when a sizeable number are dressed in attire which a normal woman wouldn't dream of wearing in public is a reflection of reality. Unfortunately there is a sizeable group of AGP characters and it is relevant to discussions for various reasons. It can not be ignored because of 'politeness'. We should be asking difficult questions on this and we should be getting answers rather than being told to shut up about it, because sexualised behaviour using women is unlawful and not ok. Seeing multiple serious interviews with transwomen in fishnet tights should raise your eyebrows.
I do think it's reasonable for women to object to seeing interviews with the likes of Kellie Malone by respectable news channels about abuse or Bergdorf about LGBT persecution or safeguarding or certain lawyers bleeting about 'corrupt' judges or Jane Fae about women's rights. Or just the regular rent a transwoman on a section relating to transmen or young females. Because this is tone deaf to the rights of others groups and safeguarding. It's not appropriate and highlights an enormous amount of poor decision making and due diligence in guest selection. These rent a quotes are 'not the only gays in the village' but given how media organisations have them on speed dial it's a problem. It's poor media representation of a minority group which gives a negative impression of the community as a whole. We aren't the ones promoting this. It's ironic as it's arguably working against the interests of transpeople because the gatekeeping on who gets airtime is dubious to say the least. It speaks volumes that less extreme views within the community (which we do know exist) aren't aired publicly more often.
Time and again it comes down to lack of safeguarding and diligence on the part of organisations and power that is leading to these problems. Women are objecting because of these failures in responsibilities and duties of care - some of which are written into law. Not because they hate transpeople.
The framing time and time again is to blame women for the failures of those in positions of authority to do their fucking jobs properly and protect all relevant parties.
It's not ok. Tarring all women as anti-trans for sticking up for themselves and children - in a lawful manner - is misogyny.