I just had a comment removed from the ‘Tell Us Your Controversial Opinion’ thread…

[BlueEyedBogWitch]

…for ‘breaking talk guidelines.’

The controversial opinion?

“Women don’t have penises. Ever.”

Apparently, that’s such a controversial opinion it breaks MN talk guidelines, despite the Supreme Court ruling.

What the fuck?

I guess she has one - in a Tupperware.

I’d be interested to know what talk guidelines that broke.

Yes, that’s what I’ve asked MNHQ to explain.

I wonder whether the TRA who complained then started a thread.

Just musing

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head.

Hopefully they’ll come back quickly with a reason. I personally can’t see why it was deleted and would have also agreed with the post if I had seen it. So I think that takes you into the 160’s!

I wonder what time you posted about women willies @BlueEyedBogWitch as the thread by the TRA started yesterday around 6pm

I shall have a look.

I posted it at 8pm.

So the TRA will have been around.

Must we pander to these people?

I was one of them!

Just posting to hear the MN explanation.

Anyway- fact yes.

Around at 19.55, 19.58, 19.59, 20.01, 20.02.

And that's a very good question.

Edited due to repeat.

Yup, my post was at 19:59 to be exact.

That was my first thought too, "blue rinse brigade" used to be old ladies! 😁

Another new intern?
The last one leaked people's personal information.

Hello @BlueEyedBogWitch
Sorry about that, your post has just been reinstated. It should not have been removed and we apologise.
MNHQ

That's good, MNHQ, it'd be worth investigating whether it was just an error, or if a moderator seriously considered it unacceptable, because they need to have a bit of a re-think. But I'm happy for that to be internal to HQ, I'm not looking for 'heads to roll' or anything, mistakes happen, and this may just have been a mistake.

Agree with this.

agree also

Glad we've established that we can say

Women don't have penises. Ever.

Have you appealed to MN and asked why your post has been deleted?

Ah I see I should have read until the end of the thread.

And there I was wondering whether it was deleted because it's not controversial enough for the thread!

Also agree.

Thanks for sorting it MNHQ.