Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"We have always been here"

599 replies

DiamondThrone · 22/06/2025 14:34

Been noticing this a lot. It seems to be the new #TWAW #nodebate #bekind, after those didn't work.

I mean - lots of things have "always been here". Like women, for instance 😄

Just interested in new terms that arise, and how they are used to try and shut down comment.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
45
BernardBlacksMolluscs · 23/06/2025 07:46

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 23:35

'A significant association was identified between gender dysphoria and ERα, SRD5A2, and STS alleles, as well as ERα and SULT2A1 genotypes. Several allele combinations were also overrepresented in transgender women, most involving AR (namely, AR-ERβ, AR-PGR, AR-COMT, CYP17-SRD5A2).'

I said that these things have been observed by researchers. I wasn't wrong! This area of research is evolving....

But even if Dave the plumber has observable factors in his brain that he has in common with Alan the computer programmer and Jason the hotel receptionist who all feel like women inside, so what?

Their brains are all men’s brains because they’re inside men’s bodies. It just means nature is mysterious blah di blah and there are a wide variety of men’s brains

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:00

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 20:30

I ask this politely (seriously, I'm not trying to wind people up here or cause offence, I'm just genuinely curious)

Surely differences in sexual development (once known as intersex conditions) prove that there isn't a biological sex binary?

If it's possible to be born with sex hormones or chromosomes that don't correspond with your genitals, doesn't that mean that nature is more mysterious than you give it credit for?

Surely if our existence hinged solely on our reproductive function, we would all be heterosexual?

You mention child bearing as a defining characteristic of womanhood. I would argue that it can be, but that women who are born without wombs (MRKH syndrome for example) or other causes of infertility, are no less 'woman' than I am. Would you agree?

Edited

You have it very wrong. People with DSDs/intersex are still either MALE or FEMALE. They are not a third sex or a mixture of both. Intersex is a MEDICAL ANOMALY. Just as a baby born with 3 legs isn't proof the human race is not just a bi-ped race but also a tri-ped race. In fact, DSDs/intersex confirms* the binary nature of sex, as all of them are either male DSDs/intersex or female DSDs/intersex.
That DSDs/intersex exists, is actually proof that sex is binary.

"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
MarieDeGournay · 23/06/2025 08:03

springbirdss · 23/06/2025 00:24

You said that you don't believe in a gender binary, no?
No binary = spectrum in my mind.
Apparently not.

I didn't say you thought sex was a spectrum, I said you thought there was no gender binary; which you did say.

I wonder what it's like being a flat earther and going onto a forum of astronauts

Or an astronaut going onto a forum of flat earthers? ;)

Edited

I have no problem saying that 'gender is a spectrum', unlike many posters on here - see, we're not a complete echo chamber!
'Gender' when used to mean the outward manifestations e.g. dress, mannerisms, etc., makes sense to me, but I know it is a social construction. What is 'male dress' or 'female mannerisms' vary from culture to culture and from century to century.

I've enjoyed being gender-non-conforming all my life, and as soon as I was politically aware, I was a radical lesbian feminist who fought against the imposition of socially constructed gender stereotypes. In particular, influenced by my own childhood, I think it's so important to avoid forcing gender stereotypes on children, so boys and girls are children first, no child is born in the wrong body, and boys and girls should be allowed do what they damn well like in terms of toys, dress, etc.

None of that in any way inhibits my ability to understand that gender is not sex, and that human sex is binary and you can't change from one sex to another. So clearly sex is not a spectrum.

By separating 'sex' and 'gender', I have no difficulty in seeing one as a spectrum and the other not.

Switching the astronaut/flat-earther simile around doesn't work, as the observable [and observed from space!] scientific facts are on the side of the astronaut, not the flat-earthers; in the 'Is sex a spectrum?' debate, science is on the GC side.

Thank you for giving us an update of Disraeli's famous response to Darwin, we can now say 'I am on the side of the astronaut'Smile

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:06

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 20:40

It's relevant to the argument that there is a biological sex binary ('man'/'woman') that is sacred as people have described.

Biological sex IS binary. There are only two gametes; ova, and sperm. There is no third gamete or third sex. No Biologist will deny that sex is binary.

DeanElderberry · 23/06/2025 08:08

The last time I had to endure a ninny banging on about freemartins was in 1985 when a colleague used to trot them out (metaphorically, not actual beasts in the office) at coffee time to try to persuade an archaeozoologist that he couldn't actually sex cattle bones. I didn't realise they were always twins. He had a side order of crowing hens, and possibly whistling women.

The ninny also used to bang on about how it would be very wrong of the government to ever legalise access to condoms to unmarried people, and how godly pharmacists would never dispense them anyway, even to the married, even with a prescription.

Obviously AIDS did for arguments like that within a few months. I'm sure he's still happily ninnying away about something that sounds clever but is actually irrelevant, wherever he is now.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:11

Annoyedone · 22/06/2025 21:05

Ummmm.. Swyer syndrome only affects males. It does not affect females. So er….. wanna try again?

Wrong way around. Swyer syndrome only affects females. No male ever has or ever will have Swyer syndrome. It's a female-only condition.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:15

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 21:09

It's relevant because people like to use a biological sex binary to disprove the existence of trans people (what you're born as, you are) but if sex can be a mixture of traits, surely this is arbitrary?

Trans people are also rare! They're like 1% of the population or something aren't they?

No one has ever said trans people don't 'eXisT'. We know schizophrenics who believe they are the second coming of Jesus 'exist'. However both are not the norm. Trans people exist as either a male person, or a female person. Regardless of any delusion or identity.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 23/06/2025 08:15

I’ve been watching the Noel Edmonds doc on ITV. It’s strangely compelling. One of his favourite phrases is ‘and that’s a scientific fact’, shortly after trotting out some nonsense about crystal frequencies or playing the piano to grapes.

I am seeing a similar dynamic

Annoyedone · 23/06/2025 08:22

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:11

Wrong way around. Swyer syndrome only affects females. No male ever has or ever will have Swyer syndrome. It's a female-only condition.

oh sorry. My bad. Thankyou for the correction.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:23

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 21:28

All I've ever said is that the existence of DSDs contradicts the notion that there is a rigid biological binary between men and women, based on specific combinations of traits. I believe that's all I've said.

Someone born with a variety of 'male' and 'female' traits might identify as a woman for example, but by some of your logic they wouldn't qualify as a woman, even if they did have some biological female traits.

How is this not relevant to the debate, when you claim that there is no ambiguity in biological sex?

All I've ever said is that the existence of DSDs contradicts the notion that there is a rigid biological binary between men and women, based on specific combinations of traits.

Except that is where you are WRONG. The existence of DSDs PROVES the binary nature of sex, because all DSDs are sex....specific.

MagpiePi · 23/06/2025 08:25

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 19:50

None of the trans people I know believe in a gender binary, they literally oppose the existence of a gender binary! Have you ever known a trans person?!

If gender is a spectrum (which seemingly we all agree it is) then it is possible to identify at either end of that spectrum ('man/woman') or anywhere in the middle. If you agree that gender is fluid, why don't you believe that it's possible to fall at the opposite end of the spectrum to the one you were assigned based on your sex?

I presume you are accepting of non-binary people and their preferred pronouns?

I’m female and I have a personality, not a gender.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:27

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 21:30

No, I believe that sex can be fluid and ambiguous!

You can believe whatever deranged fantasy you want, but sex is NOT fluid or ambiguous. You are the equivalent of a science denialist and flat-earther. You are denying basic biology. Sex by it's very definition is binary in nature. And no Biologist will attest otherwise. You are living in fantasy land and showing astonishing science-denialism and ignorance. Not even the most ardent transactivists themselves will ever say sex is not binary.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:39

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 21:37

I don't mean to come across as ageist, I'm just pointing out that I seem to be coming form a different point of view? That's okay, isn't it?

I'm not talking about passing, I'm talking about the stage in a person's life when they come out at trans, and how this might affect their experience.

I don't view DSDs as disorders as long as they don't adversely affect the person with the condition. If the person is in good health and happy with themselves then what's the issue. Variety is the spice of life

Edited

They are disorders. Every single one of them comes with HEALTH PROBLEMS. Many come with severe health defects such as brittle bones. They are syndromes. Disorders. So no, none of them are in 'good health'.

You really don't know anything at all about any of this, do you? The fact you cheerfully say diseases and disorders that impact on people is a 'spice of life' shows how heartless and completely out of touch with reality you are. This particular post of yours is absolutely disgusting in it's ignorance and cruelty.

MarieDeGournay · 23/06/2025 08:39

MagpiePi · 23/06/2025 08:25

I’m female and I have a personality, not a gender.

I'm female and I have a personality AND a gender - and it's not the one society tried to force on me when I was born femaleGrin
I would describe my female relatives and friends as being at different points on a gender spectrum.
But they are all female.

I think springbirdss is unable or unwilling to accept that all the above is equally valid - people can accept, play around with or reject gender stereotypes, but they can't change sex.

NotBadConsidering · 23/06/2025 08:42

There are 8 billion genders.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:43

springbirdss · 22/06/2025 21:38

Uhhh of course I believe in fairies

Over It Ugh GIF

FMD.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:47

suggestionsplease1 · 22/06/2025 22:22

But of course, you will be aware that the BMA have called the Supreme Court Judgement 'scientifically illiterate ' - and I imagine they are more likely to have a better grounding and education in science and the human body that the panel of judges.

FWR often presents intersex conditions / DSD as all ultimately either male or female, but of course this is certainly not the scientific consensus.

A small tiny cohort of them have claimed that. The vast overwhelming majority of the BMA disagree and know that the Supreme Court judgement is scientifically literate and sticks to basic Biology which has never been contradicted.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:49

suggestionsplease1 · 22/06/2025 22:34

Nobody needs to posit a third sex to agree that there are intersex conditions that do not fall neatly in a binary.

Intersex/DSD conditions confirm the binary nature of sex. That is what Biologists say.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 23/06/2025 08:50

MarieDeGournay · 23/06/2025 08:39

I'm female and I have a personality AND a gender - and it's not the one society tried to force on me when I was born femaleGrin
I would describe my female relatives and friends as being at different points on a gender spectrum.
But they are all female.

I think springbirdss is unable or unwilling to accept that all the above is equally valid - people can accept, play around with or reject gender stereotypes, but they can't change sex.

Yeah, having thought about this more than is probably healthy over the last few years I do believe gender, as in the expectations of society based on your sex is a thing. I’m pretty compliant with the appearance expectations for women. Primarily for an easy life and also because the bandwidth of what a woman can look like and be conforming is quite a bit wider than for men.

I don’t believe that all women prefer to wear bright, light clothes or anything though. I don’t believe in the ‘all men are like this, all women are like that’ flavour of gender

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:53

suggestionsplease1 · 22/06/2025 22:48

That's a bit of a wooly description, and I don't think everyone in the scientific community would agree with you if you were attempting to use that as an ultimate definer of 100% of mammals as either binary female or male. Well, they clearly don't, plenty happily acknowledge intersex conditions without attempting to label everything as ultimately male or female.

Intersex/DSDs conditions ARE either male or female.

That, is the binary. There is not one single intersex/DSD in history or in existence that isn't either male or female.

MagpiePi · 23/06/2025 08:53

MarieDeGournay · 23/06/2025 08:39

I'm female and I have a personality AND a gender - and it's not the one society tried to force on me when I was born femaleGrin
I would describe my female relatives and friends as being at different points on a gender spectrum.
But they are all female.

I think springbirdss is unable or unwilling to accept that all the above is equally valid - people can accept, play around with or reject gender stereotypes, but they can't change sex.

This obsession with classifying and labelling everything with regard to gender is so…idk…dull. It has the same vibe as anyone who wangs on about cross-fit or yoga or ‘being in nature’ all the time.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:56

suggestionsplease1 · 22/06/2025 22:54

I mean you can say that as much as you like, but you are not stating a scientific consensus when you repeat that.

It is a scientific consensus. You will not find one actual Biologist that disagrees. You are basically saying there is no consensus that 1+1 = 2.

A):

"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 08:57

suggestionsplease1 · 22/06/2025 22:54

I mean you can say that as much as you like, but you are not stating a scientific consensus when you repeat that.

B)

"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
SionnachRuadh · 23/06/2025 09:00

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 23/06/2025 08:50

Yeah, having thought about this more than is probably healthy over the last few years I do believe gender, as in the expectations of society based on your sex is a thing. I’m pretty compliant with the appearance expectations for women. Primarily for an easy life and also because the bandwidth of what a woman can look like and be conforming is quite a bit wider than for men.

I don’t believe that all women prefer to wear bright, light clothes or anything though. I don’t believe in the ‘all men are like this, all women are like that’ flavour of gender

I tend to go along with that myself. My instinct is that most people are gender conforming to some degree - I suspect some of that's innate, like women being much more interested in babies, and most of it's cultural - but hardly anyone is 100% their stereotypes.

It's also the reason I don't love 'effeminate' as a description for camp gay men, because how they present isn't at all female, it's a kind of alternative masculinity. In the same way I think young lesbians today would be much happier if they could see themselves as having a kind of quirky offbeat femininity instead of thinking they're defective boys.

But I think that in itself shows that sex is a binary - people who really diverge from the social expectations of their sex will often gravitate to the presentation of the other sex. That's fine as long as they understand they aren't the opposite sex.

So I come back to: sex is binary and immutable; the social expectations of sex aren't necessarily something to be afraid of; but nobody needs to be confined by those expectations.

And I'd like to get back to the days when people were valued for their unique personalities.

FeistyCat · 23/06/2025 09:01

suggestionsplease1 · 22/06/2025 22:54

I mean you can say that as much as you like, but you are not stating a scientific consensus when you repeat that.

C)

"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"
"We have always been here"