Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions

21 replies

IwantToRetire · 07/06/2025 01:37

The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would revoke guidance to the nation's hospitals that directed them to provide emergency abortions to women when they are necessary to stabilize their medical condition.

That guidance was issued to hospitals in 2022, weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court upended national abortion rights in the U.S. It was an effort by the Biden administration to preserve abortion access for extreme cases in which women were experiencing medical emergencies and needed an abortion to prevent organ loss or severe hemorrhaging, among other serious complications.

An Associated Press investigation last year found that, even with that guidance, dozens of pregnant women were being turned away from emergency rooms, including some who needed emergency abortions.

Biden argued that hospitals — including states with near-total bans — needed to provide emergency abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. That law requires emergency rooms that receive Medicare dollars to provide an exam and stabilizing treatment for all patients. Nearly all emergency rooms in the U.S. rely on Medicare funds.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which investigates hospitals that are not in compliance, said in a statement on Tuesday that it was rescinding the Biden-era guidance. The agency, however, will continue to enforce the law, “including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.”

But CMS added that it would also “rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.”

article in full at https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/trump-administration-revokes-guidance-requiring-hospitals-to-provide-emergency-abortions/ar-AA1G1t8Q?ocid=weather-verthp-feeds

MSN

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/trump-administration-revokes-guidance-requiring-hospitals-to-provide-emergency-abortions/ar-AA1G1t8Q?ocid=weather-verthp-feeds

OP posts:
CreationNat1on · 07/06/2025 09:40

Remake of the Romanian dictator Ceusescu.

BettyFilous · 07/06/2025 09:52

I just told DH about this. He said “I don’t understand. That’s just cruelty. Why would someone do that?” I told him he doesn’t understand because he’s a decent human being. We both agree this is on the same slippery slope which leads you to the Taliban and the desperate plight of Afghan women. If you fail to see women as full humans with equal rights, this dehumanising, monstrous crap is allowed to slide.

Ramblingnamechanger · 07/06/2025 17:45

This makes me feel sick.

IwantToRetire · 07/06/2025 20:04

I dont know which is worse that Trump really believes this, or he is just doing it to ingratiate himself with fundamentalist Christians. (funny that I automatically put a capital C when in fact I have no respect for them.)

But either way, it is a strange and unpleasant irony that after all the ranting and raging in the US about fundamentalist Muslims, that the US is in fact following how they govern.

OP posts:
Gabcsika · 08/06/2025 12:12

Same thing happened in Poland. In a few short years the birthrate dropped from an already low 1.4 to 1.1. And it will go lower.

Women are will not put themselves at risk of death.

This is what happens when you put your ideology over practicality.

These men speak out of both sides of their mouth. No immigration! More babies! but then do everything to make childbirth a completely unacceptable option in a modern society, and make child raising as finanically difficult as possible.

WomenShouldStillWinWomensSportsIsBack · 08/06/2025 13:14

I've typed out about 5 responses since reading this thread. None of them capture the full depth of what I think or how I feel about this. I'm lost for words.

ArabellaScott · 08/06/2025 13:38

'The agency, however, will continue to enforce the law, “including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.”'

What law does this mean?

OuterSpaceCadet · 08/06/2025 13:54

Seriously fucked up.

anyolddinosaur · 08/06/2025 15:17

@ArabellaScott the law on abortion varies from state to state. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html

edited for more up to date position

Arfidsupport · 08/06/2025 15:19

So does this mean for example a woman presenting with an ectopic pregnancy wouldn’t be treated in an emergency if it ruptured ?

spicemaiden · 08/06/2025 15:20

Blessed be the fruit

spicemaiden · 08/06/2025 15:20

Arfidsupport · 08/06/2025 15:19

So does this mean for example a woman presenting with an ectopic pregnancy wouldn’t be treated in an emergency if it ruptured ?

Edited

Yup

Arfidsupport · 08/06/2025 15:33

spicemaiden · 08/06/2025 15:20

Yup

That is horrendous. Aside from the whole thing being wrong they are exhibiting a whole new level of stupidity over things like ectopic pregnancies/ missed miscarriage etc ? They have no basic understanding of biology if they can’t see how emergency abortion care is vital ? It’s shocking.

ArabellaScott · 08/06/2025 15:48

I still don't fully understand what's going on here.

It seems the Biden introduced law wasn't working in all cases?

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-emtala-biden-trump-emergency-hospital-3640bff165dac1d28b91e8adee7e47dd

'An Associated Press investigation last year found that, even with the Biden administration’s guidance, dozens of pregnant women were being turned away from emergency rooms, including some who needed emergency abortions.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which provides oversight of hospitals, said in a statement that it will continue to enforce the federal law that, “including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.”
But CMS added that it would also “rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration’s actions.”
The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion law that initially only allowed abortions to save the life of the mother. The federal government had argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last year that Idaho’s law was in conflict with the federal law, which requires stabilizing treatment that prevents a patient’s condition from worsening.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a procedural ruling in the case last year that left key questions unanswered about whether doctors in abortion-ban states can terminate pregnancies when a woman is at risk of serious infection, organ loss or hemorrhage.'

President Donald Trump speaks at U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant, Friday, May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pa. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions

The Trump administration has announced that it is revoking guidance to the nation’s hospitals that directed them to provide emergency abortions to women when they are necessary to stabilize their medical condition.

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-emtala-biden-trump-emergency-hospital-3640bff165dac1d28b91e8adee7e47dd

anyolddinosaur · 08/06/2025 16:35

Well if you are in Texas, where any fanatic can sue you, I guess you didn't, and dont, abort anyone for anything. But if you are in some of the other states you would.

It sucks to be a pregnant American woman in some states.

SidewaysOtter · 08/06/2025 16:36

This is awful. And it doesn’t just affect American women - what happens when a female tourist, who perhaps didn't even know she was pregnant, suffers complications but is denied a life-saving abortion?

It’s all too Handmaids Tale.

anyolddinosaur · 08/06/2025 16:38

Tourists have more chance of leaving. Still wouldnt suggest anyone who is knowingly pregnant going anywhere near some states.

smellyhouseelf · 08/06/2025 16:38

spicemaiden · 08/06/2025 15:20

Blessed be the fruit

May the fucking Lord open

IwantToRetire · 08/06/2025 21:12

The Trump Administration’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) said in a press release that it “will continue to enforce EMTALA, which protects all individuals who present to a hospital emergency department seeking examination or treatment, including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.” But the agency also said that it “will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration’s actions.”

Doctors and abortion-rights advocates, however, said they feared that the Administration’s move will amplify confusion over whether doctors can provide critical care, thereby putting lives at risk.

https://time.com/7291156/trump-emergency-abortion-guidance/

What Trump Revoking Emergency Abortion Guidance Means for Care

The move doesn't change federal law, but doctors and abortion-rights advocates fear that it will amplify confusion.

https://time.com/7291156/trump-emergency-abortion-guidance/

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 08/06/2025 21:17

Tracking Abortion Laws Across the USA

More detail in article at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html including the states shaded grey where abortion is legal but with different number of weeks as the limit.

Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions
OP posts:
SidewaysOtter · 08/06/2025 21:39

anyolddinosaur · 08/06/2025 16:38

Tourists have more chance of leaving. Still wouldnt suggest anyone who is knowingly pregnant going anywhere near some states.

They might, but not if you’ve been rushed to hospital with an ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread