Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Woman's Hour - heart disease discussion

7 replies

Realityisreal · 02/06/2025 15:48

An interesting interview today regarding only 30% of people taking part in heart disease trials are women and the reasons why.
Shocked that Nuala didn't ask the guest to clarify what she means by women!
Nuala also asked about the difference in symptoms between men and women, surely someone at women's hour might finally grasp the importance of differentiating between biological men and biological women!

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 02/06/2025 17:05

'There are several sex-specific differences in drug metabolism and efficacy, and it is imperative to ensure adequate representation of both men and women when evaluating these drugs. Recent studies have addressed why these gaps may exist and how to improve participation in the future. This change will require funding to power studies to look at sex-specific outcomes, which would significantly impact the population to enroll. Further, this will necessitate investment in an infrastructure that improves patient and provider awareness and knowledge, expanding access to trial design, and adequate representation in trial leadership. Currently, the FDA has no legal requirement for trials to have a certain percentage of patients in the subgroups. The FDA could consider including gender parity in enrollment or possibly target enrollment of women equal to the composition of the disease in the population (PPR of 1).'

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978324/

Adequate enrollment of women in cardiovascular drug trials and the need for sex-specific assessment and reporting - PMC

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for women in the United States and globally. There is an abundance of evidence-based trials evaluating the efficacy of drug therapies to reduce morbidity and mortality in CVD. Additionally, ...

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978324/

Realityisreal · 02/06/2025 17:13

@ArabellaScott This makes it all the more concerning that many NHS staff are willing to claim ignorance to biological differences.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 02/06/2025 17:33

Completely. It's outrageous.

Just as medecine was almost starting to recognise the important differences in sex based medecine, in both illness and treatment, and how women's health has been affected by unacknowledged sex differences, along came genderpish and fucked it all up.

ArabellaScott · 02/06/2025 17:34

In fact, sex and gender based differences, because the reason women's health issues have historically been ignored and dismissed is all down to sexism.

laughingnow · 02/06/2025 17:49

Such nonsense

DingDongDenny · 02/06/2025 18:06

I love the term genderpish, it should be used more often

borntobequiet · 02/06/2025 18:14

For a long time, I’ve wondered what goes on inside their heads whenever they address anything appertaining to women. It’s a sort of extreme doublethink in action.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page