Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Allow Male Workers to perform mammograms and breast screening

1000 replies

CrakdEgg · 28/04/2025 20:06

OK, so the Society & College of Radiographers have their annual delegates conference, where members bring forward motions for the union to lobby on.
In the past they have passed motions to 'remove gendered language' from health communications for inclusivity - you know, 'pregnant people' and the like. They then lobby behind the scenes to the Government to follow these requests.

This year we have this motion -

Allow Male Workers to Perform Mammograms

Workforce shortages: there are 15 posts for mammographers on NHS jobs. In the UK.

But are we bothered? Do we not want males in this space, or does it not matter because we have male gynaecologists? Or will it dissuade women from attending?

I am interested to hear other people's opinions. My instincts say 'no way Jose', but I am interested in keeping males out of female spaces, so I accept my bias.

Thoughts?

Allow male health workers to perform breast examinations to help tackle workforce shortages, says So | SoR

A motion at the SoR's Annual Delegates Conference calls for a change of policy to combat staffing crisis

https://www.sor.org/news/mammography/allow-male-health-workers-to-perform-breast-examin

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Christwosheds · 04/05/2025 12:44

girljulian · 28/04/2025 20:11

I mean I'm too young to have ever had a mammogram and they sound awful, but so many men have stuck a speculum/dildocam up my cooch that I can't imagine it being more embarrassing having a man squish my boob between two plates?? It's pretty inconsistent to say men can peer up your vag but not examine your tits.

I have only had mammograms from women, I’ve had vaginal ultrasounds by both sexes, but now only from women. I have a private male gynae for HRT but I have all ultrasounds, smears etc done by a female team. I far prefer a female practitioner. I travel 140 miles for my mammograms and 250 miles for any internal ultrasound, so that tells you how much I prefer having control over who I see.

MillicentFaucet · 04/05/2025 12:44

MrsJoanDanvers · 04/05/2025 12:32

The motion in question asked the Society to explore how we could support fair access to mammography as a career, as mammography in breast screening is currently restricted to female staff

So basically nothing to do with shortening waiting times and the like but wanting to improve career prospects for men. Irrespective if it makes access to screening more difficult for women. Jeez-I don’t even know why I’m still a member and pay my subs every month to the society.

Is it a professional registration requirement @MrsJoanDanvers or more like a trade union where membership is optional?

Christwosheds · 04/05/2025 12:45

Christwosheds · 04/05/2025 12:44

I have only had mammograms from women, I’ve had vaginal ultrasounds by both sexes, but now only from women. I have a private male gynae for HRT but I have all ultrasounds, smears etc done by a female team. I far prefer a female practitioner. I travel 140 miles for my mammograms and 250 miles for any internal ultrasound, so that tells you how much I prefer having control over who I see.

And actually, mammograms have been fine. I put off having one but actually it wasn’t too bad at all, very fast .

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 12:56

I don’t think it matters whether it’s a male or a female as long as you get seen too! The last time mammogram has it was a male and a female doing the mammogram and then I got an ultrasound and it was a male and a female.
In this day and age, I don’t think it matters whether you get a diagnosis of breast cancer or hopefully not!!! 💐

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/05/2025 14:13

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 12:56

I don’t think it matters whether it’s a male or a female as long as you get seen too! The last time mammogram has it was a male and a female doing the mammogram and then I got an ultrasound and it was a male and a female.
In this day and age, I don’t think it matters whether you get a diagnosis of breast cancer or hopefully not!!! 💐

As several women on this thread have now explained, some women won't be seen if mammographers can be male, because they will decline their mammography.

Puttinginthemiles · 04/05/2025 14:26

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 12:56

I don’t think it matters whether it’s a male or a female as long as you get seen too! The last time mammogram has it was a male and a female doing the mammogram and then I got an ultrasound and it was a male and a female.
In this day and age, I don’t think it matters whether you get a diagnosis of breast cancer or hopefully not!!! 💐

I'm guessing there should be a comma after 'In this day and age, don't think it matters comma whether you get a diagnosis of breast cancer or hopefully not'?

The sex of radiographers matters to many women. If male radiographers are allowed to undertake mammograms, fewer women will attend. That matters.

borntobequiet · 04/05/2025 14:31

MrsJoanDanvers · 04/05/2025 12:32

The motion in question asked the Society to explore how we could support fair access to mammography as a career, as mammography in breast screening is currently restricted to female staff

So basically nothing to do with shortening waiting times and the like but wanting to improve career prospects for men. Irrespective if it makes access to screening more difficult for women. Jeez-I don’t even know why I’m still a member and pay my subs every month to the society.

Thank you for your posts on here, so clear and helpful.

I think we must keep up the pressure so the Society knows not to try this one on again.

MrsJoanDanvers · 04/05/2025 15:27

MillicentFaucet · 04/05/2025 12:44

Is it a professional registration requirement @MrsJoanDanvers or more like a trade union where membership is optional?

@MillicentFaucet The SOR is a union/professional society for radiographers-a bit like the Royal College of Nursing. The HCPC is the body which oversees professional registrations-and to be registered with the HCPC is mandatory for radiographers and other health professionals. In addition to that, if we want to perform Screening Mammograms, we have to have the PGCert in Mammography too. Not a requirement for symptomatic but given that most symptomatic services are combined with screening now, it’s a de facto requirement for mammography in general. Assistant practitioners do a separate qualification, not as in depth.

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 16:40

@selffellatingouroborosofhate
My two DS died of 2nd Breast Cancer so I don’t particularly care who checks me out, that’s just my opinion 🌻

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 04/05/2025 17:02

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 16:40

@selffellatingouroborosofhate
My two DS died of 2nd Breast Cancer so I don’t particularly care who checks me out, that’s just my opinion 🌻

I am sorry to hear about your sisters. I am pleased to hear you are happy to have a woman screen you so the screening service would not put off women who do care who performs a mammogram and therefore may otherwise miss their mammogram and delay a potential cancer diagnosis.

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 17:50

@CleaningSilverCandlesticks
As I’ve said that just my opinion 🌻

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 17:59

@Puttinginthemiles
Who a crap about comma’s, jog on!

My two DS died of 2nd Breast Cancer so I don’t particularly care who checks me out, that’s just MY opinion 🌻

Have a lovely bank holiday weekend!

EsmaCannonball · 04/05/2025 18:06

I, too, have had immediate family members die from or survive breast cancer. One of them was told by a male GP that she was too young for breast cancer and that she should stop reading women's magazines as they were putting things into her head. She waited three months before getting a second opinion because he had made her feel stupid.

Saying that it doesn't matter if the mammographer is male or female is saying that women and their hang-ups or their judgementalism is the problem. It's yet another way of laying the need for female-only spaces at the door of women being a bit fussy and prudish or nasty towards men rather than at a significant proportion of men behaving badly towards women in mixed-sex spaces, leading to those spaces becoming stressful, hostile or no-go environments for women.

Littlek0406 · 04/05/2025 18:38

@EsmaCannonball

Sorry for losses 🌻

Nomoreidea · 04/05/2025 22:09

MillicentFaucet · 04/05/2025 12:06

"We understand that this coverage has led to distress and confusion, with some contacting screening services or cancelling appointments, concerned that they will be having a man perform their mammogram. We are deeply sorry for the concern this has caused and are working to provide clear and accurate information."

The Society of Radiographers statement on the motion, incredible that it was passed at conference but hopefully the reaction will scupper any further moves to open up the screening service to male radiographers. Notice how the distress and confusion is blamed on people noticing the motion instead of whoever thought bringing and passing the motion was a good idea. Just own your mistakes like adults fgs
Full statement here Full statement

So wait a minute so many people debating how we need male staff to get down waiting lists and better to be seen by a man than not seen at all, when that was never what this was actually about?

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 04/05/2025 22:41

Nomoreidea · 04/05/2025 22:09

So wait a minute so many people debating how we need male staff to get down waiting lists and better to be seen by a man than not seen at all, when that was never what this was actually about?

Of course not. It is about men and what they want.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 04/05/2025 22:53

EsmaCannonball · 04/05/2025 18:06

I, too, have had immediate family members die from or survive breast cancer. One of them was told by a male GP that she was too young for breast cancer and that she should stop reading women's magazines as they were putting things into her head. She waited three months before getting a second opinion because he had made her feel stupid.

Saying that it doesn't matter if the mammographer is male or female is saying that women and their hang-ups or their judgementalism is the problem. It's yet another way of laying the need for female-only spaces at the door of women being a bit fussy and prudish or nasty towards men rather than at a significant proportion of men behaving badly towards women in mixed-sex spaces, leading to those spaces becoming stressful, hostile or no-go environments for women.

Exactly this.

Too many women have had their tits groped by male GPs abusing their positions of trust. Women wanting female mammographers is because we know that some men can't be trusted around women.

LonginesPrime · 05/05/2025 05:19

Have not RTFT, so apologies if this has been mentioned already, but just in case it hasn’t and might be helpful to anyone, I just posted this on the newer thread about the latest statement:

Wasn’t this motion triggered by the fact they were already allowing males with a GRC to be recruited as “female” based on the confusion over how the GRA interacts with the EA for the purpose of the single-sex exemptions?

For example, this 2023 article in Radiography, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Society and College of Radiographers, written by professionals with NHS affiliations states:

However, current legislation, specifically Part 1 of Schedule 9 of the Equality Act 2010, allows employers to exclude certain protected characteristics (in this case, gender and gender reassignment) based on occupational requirements, permitting the restriction of mammography roles to females only. Furthermore, the Act sanctions the dismissal of existing employees if they no longer meet these requirements, such as a female transitioning to male. Thus, while transgender men and non-binary individuals are encouraged to participate in screening, they are effectively barred from working in breast screening roles based solely on their gender identification.

My interpretation of this (notably the second and third sentences) is that up until the SC ruling, the NHS and the Soc of Radiographers were classing transwomen with a GRC as legally female and transmen with a GRC as legally male, for the purposes of who could be employed as a mammographer in the NHS.

This would also explain the curious timing of this motion, i.e. while other medical orgs are coming out with statements about trans inclusion in light of the SC ruling, why else would one of the few professions restricted to female practitioners suddenly decide that their priority is letting males perform the role? Because they’re already doing it, but their sex in the eyes of the law has been confirmed by the SC as being based on biology instead of a certificate.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 05/05/2025 05:34

LonginesPrime · 05/05/2025 05:19

Have not RTFT, so apologies if this has been mentioned already, but just in case it hasn’t and might be helpful to anyone, I just posted this on the newer thread about the latest statement:

Wasn’t this motion triggered by the fact they were already allowing males with a GRC to be recruited as “female” based on the confusion over how the GRA interacts with the EA for the purpose of the single-sex exemptions?

For example, this 2023 article in Radiography, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Society and College of Radiographers, written by professionals with NHS affiliations states:

However, current legislation, specifically Part 1 of Schedule 9 of the Equality Act 2010, allows employers to exclude certain protected characteristics (in this case, gender and gender reassignment) based on occupational requirements, permitting the restriction of mammography roles to females only. Furthermore, the Act sanctions the dismissal of existing employees if they no longer meet these requirements, such as a female transitioning to male. Thus, while transgender men and non-binary individuals are encouraged to participate in screening, they are effectively barred from working in breast screening roles based solely on their gender identification.

My interpretation of this (notably the second and third sentences) is that up until the SC ruling, the NHS and the Soc of Radiographers were classing transwomen with a GRC as legally female and transmen with a GRC as legally male, for the purposes of who could be employed as a mammographer in the NHS.

This would also explain the curious timing of this motion, i.e. while other medical orgs are coming out with statements about trans inclusion in light of the SC ruling, why else would one of the few professions restricted to female practitioners suddenly decide that their priority is letting males perform the role? Because they’re already doing it, but their sex in the eyes of the law has been confirmed by the SC as being based on biology instead of a certificate.

And Clare Dimyon's letter suddenly makes sense...

borntobequiet · 05/05/2025 08:25

LonginesPrime · 05/05/2025 05:19

Have not RTFT, so apologies if this has been mentioned already, but just in case it hasn’t and might be helpful to anyone, I just posted this on the newer thread about the latest statement:

Wasn’t this motion triggered by the fact they were already allowing males with a GRC to be recruited as “female” based on the confusion over how the GRA interacts with the EA for the purpose of the single-sex exemptions?

For example, this 2023 article in Radiography, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Society and College of Radiographers, written by professionals with NHS affiliations states:

However, current legislation, specifically Part 1 of Schedule 9 of the Equality Act 2010, allows employers to exclude certain protected characteristics (in this case, gender and gender reassignment) based on occupational requirements, permitting the restriction of mammography roles to females only. Furthermore, the Act sanctions the dismissal of existing employees if they no longer meet these requirements, such as a female transitioning to male. Thus, while transgender men and non-binary individuals are encouraged to participate in screening, they are effectively barred from working in breast screening roles based solely on their gender identification.

My interpretation of this (notably the second and third sentences) is that up until the SC ruling, the NHS and the Soc of Radiographers were classing transwomen with a GRC as legally female and transmen with a GRC as legally male, for the purposes of who could be employed as a mammographer in the NHS.

This would also explain the curious timing of this motion, i.e. while other medical orgs are coming out with statements about trans inclusion in light of the SC ruling, why else would one of the few professions restricted to female practitioners suddenly decide that their priority is letting males perform the role? Because they’re already doing it, but their sex in the eyes of the law has been confirmed by the SC as being based on biology instead of a certificate.

This is what I suspected, and you’ve clarified it.

KnottyAuty · 05/05/2025 12:03

Whyjustwhy83 · 03/05/2025 12:27

Then how have these women managed to go to smear appointments or to gynecologists they already have males performing? Clearly women have already found a way to opt out without causing issue or there would be more uproar about women's rights being trampled over.
Yes a % of women won't like it won't feel comfortable but steps can be put in place i.e opting out being treat by a male or a chaperone. A mammogram can be life saving, more radiographs are needed, yes push for more women to be trained but atm if a male doing it means women are seen quicker and more may be saved.
Also as a career who be would be helping a client fill out said forms and I don't care about being seen by man. I would never force my opinion on a client or choose for them I would make it clear to them and make sure they knew they could refuse a man without them facing any backlash.

The first question should be - why is there a shortage? Are they training enough people? Which staff leave and why?

Only once we know the answers to this can we identify a solution.

People are assuming that male staff will sort the problem but that’s a big leap which might cause more problems than it solves.

Has anyone seen an analysis published anywhere that I can read please?

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 05/05/2025 14:32

KnottyAuty · 05/05/2025 12:03

The first question should be - why is there a shortage? Are they training enough people? Which staff leave and why?

Only once we know the answers to this can we identify a solution.

People are assuming that male staff will sort the problem but that’s a big leap which might cause more problems than it solves.

Has anyone seen an analysis published anywhere that I can read please?

Turns out there isn’t a shortage of mammographers. The motion is just down to men wanting to do it.

DungareesTrombonesDinos · 05/05/2025 14:48

My biological Mum had breast cancer in her 50s so this is a concern for me as I get older. I don't feel like I would be bothered with a man doing it but I can't say for sure as I've not experienced it. And I absolutely stand by any woman who says she would not want a man conducting her mammogram.

LonginesPrime · 05/05/2025 14:54

KnottyAuty · 05/05/2025 12:03

The first question should be - why is there a shortage? Are they training enough people? Which staff leave and why?

Only once we know the answers to this can we identify a solution.

People are assuming that male staff will sort the problem but that’s a big leap which might cause more problems than it solves.

Has anyone seen an analysis published anywhere that I can read please?

I mean, technically, they’re not wrong that it would resolve any staffing shortage, because it will significantly reduce demand.

Deterring patients from attending is a rather bold strategy to cut NHS waiting times, though…

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread