Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Kooth and gender ideology wrt mental health and young people

23 replies

its2346 · 25/04/2025 23:52

Our local council is implementing Kooth on all children’s iPads, from about ages 10 and up. I know it has been criticised in the past for its approach to gender ideology. Please tell me what you know about it and if parents should still be concerned.

OP posts:
Timefortea4 · 26/04/2025 09:40

I logged into the Kooth chat rooms a while ago to check this. Young kids obsessing about their identities supporting each other. Very odd, I would not want my children to access it.

its2346 · 26/04/2025 11:06

No, nor would I.

In the Telegraph article last year it also referred to peer to peer ‘support’ on issues of anorexia. I just wondered if significant changes had been implemented since then.

OP posts:
Pyjamatimenow · 26/04/2025 11:12

Following for info

Pyjamatimenow · 26/04/2025 11:29

the information we have been sent by school is that the peer to peer communities are moderated and safe. I doubt that’s true

its2346 · 26/04/2025 19:11

I’ve been trying to research Kooth — and it’s not easy. There’s a heavy reliance on words like ‘training’, ‘safeguarding’, and ‘professional standards’, but it’s hard to work out what any of that actually means in practice.

I think …

Training is minimum Level 4 diploma, BACP-recognised.

Safeguarding is Level 3, but as far as I can tell that’s just a one-day training session.

It’s the peer-to-peer discussion groups that really bother me. Monitoring seems heavily reliant on tech tools — keyword detection, AI pattern recognition — which then flags a moderator (aka an ‘emotional wellbeing supporter’ 🙄). I can’t see why I should trust that any more than ‘peer-to-peer’ interaction on any other social media platform.

And then there’s the Telegraph article from last year (linked). Kooth responded to this by stressing they weren’t under investigation and that safeguarding was Level 3, not 1. But honestly, those weren’t the parts of the article that concerned me most.

The whole approach seems to assume children won’t come to their parents. Maybe not — but I’d hope I can spot distress when it happens, and respond.

I can’t help thinking that supplying tools like this implicitly tells children there is better support out there than their parents. Also the dopamine effect of tech might make a child go to Kooth first, and that might actually mean they are less likely to come to their parents at all.

<a class="break-all" href="https://archive.ph/2024.03.22-182247/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/21/pro-trans-website-for-children-backed-by-nhs-investigated" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://archive.ph/2024.03.22-182247/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/21/pro-trans-website-for-children-backed-by-nhs-investigated/

OP posts:
Pyjamatimenow · 30/04/2025 13:15

It looks like this is the time of year that they are going into a lot of schools in my area especially with the y6s doing SATs. School’s are well intentioned, hoping to help with exam anxiety etc but parents should have a good look at what’s being offered

ArabellaScott · 30/04/2025 13:23

Our council rolled this out and immediately all the red flags went up.

Wholly agree that the structure seems far too lax on safeguarding.

ArabellaScott · 30/04/2025 13:26

'How do you manage any safeguarding or risk concerns, when you are an anonymous service?

We believe that our anonymity supports effective safeguarding, rather than acting as a barrier. ...Young people consistently tell us that the anonymity aspect of our service enables them to disclose things that they wouldn't otherwise tell anyone....

Why do you encourage users to keep their username and password private from their parents?

We encourage all users to ensure that their log in details are private. This is to protect their confidentiality and anonymity. We know that users may not disclose things if they are concerned that their family or friends are able to see that information.'

ArabellaScott · 30/04/2025 13:27

'What if an adult signs up to the site and pretends to be a child?

Our sign up process relies on trust that people select accurate responses around their demographic information, including age. This does mean that it is possible for adult individuals to sign up with an account where they are claiming to be a young person. However, our continuous safeguarding and moderation processes ensure that even if this was the case, they would not be able to interact inappropriately with other users.'

All copypasted from: https://www.kooth.com/parent-faqs

Pyjamatimenow · 30/04/2025 13:31

Doesn’t sound brilliant does it? Very worrying

MrsOvertonsWindow · 30/04/2025 13:51

"10 year olds need confidentiality from their parents" - said no responsible adult ever!
We "trust" that adults won't sign up as children - said no responsible safeguarding organisation ever.

At a time when parents and society generally are increasingly concerned about the negative impact of social media on children and safeguarding organisations report huge problems with predators accessing children online, Kooth raises so many red flags.

OuterSpaceCadet · 30/04/2025 16:11

An adult posing as a kid would't necessarily need to behave inappropriately in the eyes of the AI mod tools to gain trust of a child user. Would Kooth spot anything that suggested that users were meeting up IRL having met online?

It's very suspicious to start from the stance that the account is secret from the child's parents. I'd be really surprised at a school going along with this. It runs counter to safeguarding etc. A child receiving confidential therapy will know that the therapist will need to break confidentiality if the child says anything that indicates they or someone else will come to harm. Only in very specific circumstances will therapists and schools not inform parents, and those will be situations where social services are already involved.

its2346 · 30/04/2025 18:13

ArabellaScott · 30/04/2025 13:27

'What if an adult signs up to the site and pretends to be a child?

Our sign up process relies on trust that people select accurate responses around their demographic information, including age. This does mean that it is possible for adult individuals to sign up with an account where they are claiming to be a young person. However, our continuous safeguarding and moderation processes ensure that even if this was the case, they would not be able to interact inappropriately with other users.'

All copypasted from: https://www.kooth.com/parent-faqs

Edited

Bloody hell, that shocked me!

OP posts:
TheVeryLastofUs · 30/04/2025 18:15

Kooth is problematic on many levels. They do employ some trained counsellors, but many of their direct delivery staff are ‘emotional wellbeing practitioners’. They may have some kind of qualification or lived experience of their own, but this is patchy. Their pay scales for these roles are also incredibly low and as such they struggle to attract suitable staff, and struggle to hold onto them. Their turnover rates are astronomical.

Although they have safeguarding structures in place, the anonymity makes actual safeguarding very difficult. They partially mask IP addresses so it is also impossible to trace young people who explicitly tell Kooth that they are at immediate risk.

They do have some reasonable reviews online, however they are bumped up in reflection of the 5* reviews that they request are left by adults after going to assemblies etc. Reviews from actual young people are poor and in some cases incredibly worrying. Employee reviews are also quite damning.

Internal culture is not great. Big staff turnover as I mentioned and bullying is rife through all levels of the business. Anyone courageous enough to speak out and challenge leadership behaviour or the safety of young people are swiftly and quietly exited.

They do have a significant problem with adults signing up and pretending to be young people. This is denied internally and low paid staff trying to manage this are silenced. Users cannot directly communicate with each other, but it’s concerning that even after all these years, they have not been able to implement measures to manage this.

Kooth talk an extremely good talk, hence their contracts up and down the country. They are very skilled at this. The actual service is unsafe.

I don’t believe this will change for the young people. Even if they do get investigated somewhere down the line; they talk a very good talk.

peakedtraybake · 30/04/2025 18:22

I signed up a while ago (claiming to be a child) to nosey around and see if it looked suitable for my children. It was a definite no. Lots of children describing their misery and not getting replies or else getting replies from other miserable children. It didn't look very effective as peer support.
I didn't see anything specifically related to GI, but IIRC their policy stance is pro GI.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 30/04/2025 18:42

TheVeryLastofUs · 30/04/2025 18:15

Kooth is problematic on many levels. They do employ some trained counsellors, but many of their direct delivery staff are ‘emotional wellbeing practitioners’. They may have some kind of qualification or lived experience of their own, but this is patchy. Their pay scales for these roles are also incredibly low and as such they struggle to attract suitable staff, and struggle to hold onto them. Their turnover rates are astronomical.

Although they have safeguarding structures in place, the anonymity makes actual safeguarding very difficult. They partially mask IP addresses so it is also impossible to trace young people who explicitly tell Kooth that they are at immediate risk.

They do have some reasonable reviews online, however they are bumped up in reflection of the 5* reviews that they request are left by adults after going to assemblies etc. Reviews from actual young people are poor and in some cases incredibly worrying. Employee reviews are also quite damning.

Internal culture is not great. Big staff turnover as I mentioned and bullying is rife through all levels of the business. Anyone courageous enough to speak out and challenge leadership behaviour or the safety of young people are swiftly and quietly exited.

They do have a significant problem with adults signing up and pretending to be young people. This is denied internally and low paid staff trying to manage this are silenced. Users cannot directly communicate with each other, but it’s concerning that even after all these years, they have not been able to implement measures to manage this.

Kooth talk an extremely good talk, hence their contracts up and down the country. They are very skilled at this. The actual service is unsafe.

I don’t believe this will change for the young people. Even if they do get investigated somewhere down the line; they talk a very good talk.

Thanks for this. Yet another organisation letting children down while cashing in on their mental vulnerability. Shameful.
Time for another journalist expose on them.

ArabellaScott · 30/04/2025 20:17

TheVeryLastofUs · 30/04/2025 18:15

Kooth is problematic on many levels. They do employ some trained counsellors, but many of their direct delivery staff are ‘emotional wellbeing practitioners’. They may have some kind of qualification or lived experience of their own, but this is patchy. Their pay scales for these roles are also incredibly low and as such they struggle to attract suitable staff, and struggle to hold onto them. Their turnover rates are astronomical.

Although they have safeguarding structures in place, the anonymity makes actual safeguarding very difficult. They partially mask IP addresses so it is also impossible to trace young people who explicitly tell Kooth that they are at immediate risk.

They do have some reasonable reviews online, however they are bumped up in reflection of the 5* reviews that they request are left by adults after going to assemblies etc. Reviews from actual young people are poor and in some cases incredibly worrying. Employee reviews are also quite damning.

Internal culture is not great. Big staff turnover as I mentioned and bullying is rife through all levels of the business. Anyone courageous enough to speak out and challenge leadership behaviour or the safety of young people are swiftly and quietly exited.

They do have a significant problem with adults signing up and pretending to be young people. This is denied internally and low paid staff trying to manage this are silenced. Users cannot directly communicate with each other, but it’s concerning that even after all these years, they have not been able to implement measures to manage this.

Kooth talk an extremely good talk, hence their contracts up and down the country. They are very skilled at this. The actual service is unsafe.

I don’t believe this will change for the young people. Even if they do get investigated somewhere down the line; they talk a very good talk.

Thank you.

If I were an investigative journalist, I'd be looking into this.

ArabellaScott · 15/05/2026 22:08

Just having another look at this service.

Some worrying recent reviews.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/kooth.com

'Pushed further into distress by harmful chat :(

Mocked, humiliated and pushed further into distress is my experience :( had to call a real counsellor to calm me down.'

'Sadly takes hours for reply
I work with a lot of families. Which I recommend kooth for the young ones. Used for first time today with a family member and sadly can't say it's good. Waited hours for a response to a message then signed us out. I know this is because they are busy but anything can happen in those hours.

'This generic service is not adequate
This generic service is not adequate, I actually feel like it has caused more stress than resolving any of my mental health barriers. However I recently started receiving support from The Better Health Generation and their support has been incredible and the turnaround to get me seen by their clinicians amazing.'

'Would give it 0 stars if I could
Terrible service, hard to get on live chat and advice is more around signposting or reading an article, then actually personalised emotional wellbeing support to me.'

'Worst service ever
Joined and waited in a queue over 3 hours to be told they had to close the chat queue. They must be understaffed and dont have the resources to help young people. Always get copy snd paste messages with a load of links that arent helpful. Such a waste of time.'

ArabellaScott · 15/05/2026 22:09

I checked Childline's reviews while I was there. Also not looking good.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.childline.org.uk

DisappearingGirl · 15/05/2026 22:45

peakedtraybake · 30/04/2025 18:22

I signed up a while ago (claiming to be a child) to nosey around and see if it looked suitable for my children. It was a definite no. Lots of children describing their misery and not getting replies or else getting replies from other miserable children. It didn't look very effective as peer support.
I didn't see anything specifically related to GI, but IIRC their policy stance is pro GI.

Yes I did this too.

Lots of children describing their misery and not getting replies or else getting replies from other miserable children.

Yes this is how I would describe it as well. I couldn't see much evidence of moderation or how to speak to a helpful adult. There would have been nothing stopping me interacting with the kids on there either (I didn't).

ArabellaScott · 16/05/2026 08:10

From 2025:

'In the UK, the new Government has stated it intends to address mental health needs, though we have experienced an inevitable lag in the translation of these intentions into concrete initiatives and funding. This, combined with sustained pressure on public finances in general, has led to a further challenging year in the
UK. As a result, churn in the UK has been £2.0 million (2023: £2.3 million) though we have successfully retained existing contracts for the longer-term with some services now contracted for five years or more, and secured new opportunities by partnering with new types of funders. That said, the stability afforded by a new Government, alongside clear recognition of the growing impact that poor mental health has not just on individuals and their families, but on economic growth, is likely to drive increased appetite for innovation. Our focus on sustaining our solid foundations in 2024 ensures that we can be front-footed in working with our partners across the sector to accelerate our reach and identify new opportunities. We were very fortunate to have Sherry B. Husa join the Board in 2024. Sherry brings over 35 years’ experience of the US healthcare sector, providing us with crucial insights as we accelerate our growth in the US. Having generated an operating profit of £9.2 million in 2024, we enter 2025 with a proven business model, £21.8 million in cash, no debt and an undrawn $9.5 million working capital credit facility. Despite a complex environment, we see significant'

'UK revenue decreased by 6% to £18.0 million (2023: £19.1 million). '

'Gross profit increased by 101% to £52.0 million (2023: £25.9 million) with the gross margin rising to 77.9% (2023: 77.6%). ... The UK gross margin saw a slight increase, driven by a shift toward greater usage of self-help tools in place of direct practitioner support.'

(Kooth operates in both the UK and the US, so profits there include both).

Source: https://investors.kooth.com/docs/koothplclibraries/archive/results/full-year-results-2024.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

ArabellaScott · 16/05/2026 08:14

https://investors.kooth.com/rns-alerts/archive/2025/150425.asp

'Kooth remains the largest digital mental health provider in the UK, with over 65% of the youth population having free access via the NHS and local authorities.
We took Kooth public on the AIM segment of the London Stock Exchange in 2020...'

'UK revenue decreased by 6% to £18.0 million '

ArabellaScott · 16/05/2026 08:14

They are making a fucktonne of money.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page