Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Unison elections - female only seats are not so

57 replies

FrodoTheBlueWhippet · 25/04/2025 16:33

Disappointed to receive ballot papers from Unison today for their upcoming elections.

Why is it acceptable to have men standing in the Disabled Members' Seats Female Seat??

OP posts:
pontefractals · 06/05/2025 18:20

DiliGaff · 25/04/2025 22:16

The candidate in question seems really shit, regardless of sex or gender identity. There’s not one mention of what he would do for female disabled members in that drivel he’s written. In fact it gets cut off mid sentence as he’s failed to adhere to the word limit.

I’ll be voting for the other candidates who have better explained what they hope to do for disabled members, then cancel my direct debit.

I was (amidst the rage) quite amused at the "statement cut at word limit" - why do they always BLETHER so much? It's like the TIMs who come on here to tell us how evil we are - they all need to learn to edit.

pontefractals · 06/05/2025 18:31

I've noticed a few candidates have included a line about not "raising issues for factional reasons" and I'm somewhat intrigued by what exactly that means. Could go either way, really. There is also someone (not Ellie) proudly talking about having "spearheaded the Trans Ally Training" which apparently resulted in an "almost 300% increase in union activists who are part of the trans community ". No, thank you.

SameyMcNameChange · 18/05/2025 09:11

This has made the Telegraph today.

SionnachRuadh · 18/05/2025 09:32

A Unison member should contact the Certification Officer:
Complain to the Certification Officer about a trade union or an employers’ association - GOV.UK

I know it's only been a couple of weeks, but in parallel with the EHRC developing its guidance, the CO should really be on the case when it comes to unions.

ZeldaFighter · 18/05/2025 12:19

There is one thing I really don't understand. If these organisations wanted to support transgender people, why don't they? Why don't they have a Transgender Officer, alongside the Women's and Disability Officers? No one would oppose that. There would never be any conflict or if there was, it could be clearly explained and discussed.

You can mix Protected Characteristics but I don't think I've often seen "Race and Disability Officer" etc as it cheapens each issue.

Why don't Unsion just create a Transgender Officer seat?

countrysidedeficit · 18/05/2025 12:29

ZeldaFighter · 18/05/2025 12:19

There is one thing I really don't understand. If these organisations wanted to support transgender people, why don't they? Why don't they have a Transgender Officer, alongside the Women's and Disability Officers? No one would oppose that. There would never be any conflict or if there was, it could be clearly explained and discussed.

You can mix Protected Characteristics but I don't think I've often seen "Race and Disability Officer" etc as it cheapens each issue.

Why don't Unsion just create a Transgender Officer seat?

You can't do that, that would be 'segregation'. Hmm

ZeldaFighter · 18/05/2025 12:34

countrysidedeficit · 18/05/2025 12:29

You can't do that, that would be 'segregation'. Hmm

But then so is a Women's Officer!!!

I hope this starts to happen because I imagine there are important and distinct issues facing trans people that would be better addressed seperately. You would also be able to balance rights more fairly - look at the restrictions around demanding disabled access facilities!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread