The ministers’ position, that Equality Act protections for sex and sexual orientation pertained to “certificated” sex, rather than biological sex, was said by judges to exhibit “incoherence and absurdity"
No shit! I hadn't realised they had said that. Incoherence sounds vaguely 'poor but possibly academic', but absurdity so fucking doesn't.
it's a really weird experience watching the entire country realise the emperor is naked, when you've known he's starkers all along.
They couldn’t rely on reason or evidence as these concepts are commonly understood, because no good arguments for transubstantiation by means of lip gloss existed.
Giving Brendan O'Neill a bit of a run for his money there.
She's a brilliant writer