Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

BBC uncritically repeats tainted data on “LGBTQ” conversion therapy.

6 replies

CarobBean72 · 01/04/2025 14:11

The BBC has just published a Stonewall press release without checking the figures - or even wondering how plausible they can be.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w1gl530vvo.amp

Including the claim that 1 in 10 “LGBTQ people” - they don’t explain how they define this” have undergone exorcism.

As no more than 5% of the U.K. population attends church of ANY kind, as few denominations offer exorcism for ANY cause, and as in 2017 it was found that <2% of LGBTQ people had been offered ANY form of “conversion therapy”, this is obvious nonsense!

How come Parry did not query it?

For the figures to be remotely accurate, ministers of religion across the country would be conducting a “conversion therapy” exorcism for every 3 people they marry. Surely someone would have noticed?

The polling data now released by OpiniumResearch shows no info on how respondents were recruited - obviously a factor - and that the polling company has inadvertently swapped the names of two columns of data: “Transgender” & “another gender identity” between different pages.

That’s a difference between 18 people, & 214 people.

How is the BBC so easily misled on this issue? Where are the fact checkers?

The Stonewall press release is clearly intended to lobby Parliament on the proposed Conversion Therapy Bill.

I’d pretty much given up complaining to the BBC but I’m having another go as this is shocking!

A selfie of a man with medium-length brown hair looking seriously at the camera against a backdrop of a Mediterranean landscape. You can see from his shoulders he's wearing a grey t-shirt and backpack.

'I needed years of therapy over battle to change my sexuality' - BBC News

The government is drafting plans to outlaw conversion practices, with a Bill set to be introduced by the summer.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w1gl530vvo.amp

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 01/04/2025 14:42

https://www.opinium.com/stonewall-press-tables/

'The tables on this page have been updated as of 1st of April. A previous version of these tables that was published online incorrectly had the labels for columns F and G the wrong way around. This is now corrected in the downloadable file.'

FFS.

Stonewall Press Tables - Opinium

Downloadable tables for this data can be found here. The survey was conducted between 24th January – 11th March 2024 among 2,000 adults who identified as members of the LGBTQ+ community who live in England, Scotland, or Wales. Participants were intervi...

https://www.opinium.com/stonewall-press-tables

JulesJules · 01/04/2025 14:58

Ridiculous, they can't have thought about it at all before repeating. Laughable

Hermyknee · 01/04/2025 15:04

The biggest numbers are in the non-binary and transgender columns so does that mean that if someone said ‘are you are sure you’re not gay?’ that’s counts as ‘trying to convert sexuality’ in their sample? How can you explore sexuality?
It is very confusing.

TheOtherRaven · 01/04/2025 15:36

It's meant to be. Sunlight and clarity would not help this agenda in any way.

CarobBean72 · 01/04/2025 16:03

Hermyknee · 01/04/2025 15:04

The biggest numbers are in the non-binary and transgender columns so does that mean that if someone said ‘are you are sure you’re not gay?’ that’s counts as ‘trying to convert sexuality’ in their sample? How can you explore sexuality?
It is very confusing.

It probably means someone said “What does non-binary mean?” at some point.

OP posts:
Sazzasez · 01/04/2025 16:07

ArabellaScott · 01/04/2025 14:42

https://www.opinium.com/stonewall-press-tables/

'The tables on this page have been updated as of 1st of April. A previous version of these tables that was published online incorrectly had the labels for columns F and G the wrong way around. This is now corrected in the downloadable file.'

FFS.

Oh my goodness, did nobody proofread?

And it’s taken them until today - and lots of people pointing it out - to notice?

Still: why not? If their client is Stonewall they’d be happy to just copy & paste.

And the BBC too.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread