Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Almut Gadow has received a settlement

6 replies

angelinawasrobbed · 22/02/2025 17:56

Wasn't sure if this had been noted here previously

"A law lecturer who was sacked by the Open University after expressing gender-critical beliefs has been handed a payout from the institution.
Dr Almut Gadow was dismissed for gross misconduct in November 2022 after she criticised changes to the curriculum based on gender identity in an online forum.
She claimed the university was introducing requirements to “indoctrinate students in gender identity theory”.
The lecturer, who taught law at the university for almost a decade, claimed she had raised concerns about new teaching requirements, including making students use offenders’ preferred pronouns.
She took the university to an employment tribunal alleging she was “harassed, discriminated against, and unfairly dismissed because I reject gender ideology and believe in academic freedom”.
The Open University has now settled with Dr Gadow before a hearing was scheduled to take place later this month, The Telegraph has learnt.
A spokesman for the Open University said: “We can confirm that a settlement has been reached with Dr Gadow.” It would not comment on whether it admitted liability.

"In a statement, Dr Gadow accused the university of agreeing “to pay me an undisclosable amount of money to avoid a public airing of the facts”.
“After long claiming it could not wait for the truth to come out in court, that it would fight this case ‘vigorously’ and ‘robustly’ all the way, the OU [Open University] – while making no admission as to liability – has resolved the matter by way of payment of an undisclosable sum of money.
“Why, the OU faithful will be asking, has the university decided to pay me an undisclosable amount of money to avoid a public airing of the facts, if what I said was not true?” "

OP posts:
angelinawasrobbed · 22/02/2025 17:58

Oh sorry - I see that it has been discussed. Still, can't see it too often ;)

OP posts:
Ariana12 · 22/02/2025 18:22

This is the fourth case the OU has either lost or settled, paying goodness knows what in compensation and legal fees. And in every case they've trumpeted how they had a great case they were keen to present in tribunal. They used to be such a good resource for people who wanted or needed a non-standard route to higher education. But now they seem just out of control. Who'd want to work there!

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 23/02/2025 08:30

2 years and then only because they settled, it shouldn't be taking so long for women to get justice. I'm grateful to her for fighting, well done her.

RaspberryScrubs · 23/02/2025 11:32

Thank you for the heads up , I had missed this.

Ariana12 · 23/02/2025 20:19

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 23/02/2025 08:30

2 years and then only because they settled, it shouldn't be taking so long for women to get justice. I'm grateful to her for fighting, well done her.

Agree! I noticed some posts on X suggesting that the EHRC might start asking them a few questions. They have statutary powers to require info, which could be interesting!

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 24/02/2025 14:51

Ariana12 · 23/02/2025 20:19

Agree! I noticed some posts on X suggesting that the EHRC might start asking them a few questions. They have statutary powers to require info, which could be interesting!

About time someone somewhere in this country started asking questions, instead of us having to rely on people outside the country pointing it all out.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page