Doctors who change gender scrub links to public records

[lcakethereforeIam]

I thought this deserved its own thread, rather than being lost in the Sandie Peggie threads. So apologies for another one.

https://archive.ph/8YYuM

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/20/doctors-change-gender-scrub-records/

I can't say I'm surprised, it's really just confirmation of something I suspected from posts about the new GMC no. in the other threads. It's much the same as the the holes in safeguarding caused by allowing name and identity changes for any person who claims to be transgender.

Wes Streeting is wringing his hands

https://archive.ph/W6lbJ

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/20/wes-streeting-condemns-wiping-of-trans-doctors-records/

I think that as a society we have to move away from the idea that there is a stigma attached to being trans or being "outed". [...] If we can get to a position where there isn't a stigma perhaps as a society we can stop playing make believe and move forward?

There never was a stigma, and there still isn't, beyond being fucked off with idiocy like the Upton case.

Transphobia has never been a significant thing.

Homophobia, yes, absolutely. And the original concern of the homosexual transsexual was being outed as being homosexual, rather than being a straight woman. It was never about being outed as being "trans". (Indeed, the "trans-ness" only made the homosexuality more palatable, hence getting the right to same-sex marry earlier).

Straight transvestites have never been the subject of more than moderate ridicule - their biggest concern was always being very clear that they weren't homosexual, and their groups like the Beaumont Society would have strict "no gays" rules. If you were respectably married, that was ideal.

The modern hysterical fear of "transphobia" and "outing" is role play and part of the manipulation to get what they want - picking up the trappings of the gay rights movement, just like they steal everything else.

So if you sexually assault patients you chase your ge der to get a clean record, then you now continue as before. Then you detransition, will they give you a third new GMC number then?

Sounds very handy for sex abusers.

Either they don't care or they are actively supporting it.

Who regulates the GMC?

Parliament, apparently. That you, Wes?

https://www.gmc-uk.org/about/who-we-are/our-chief-executive-and-senior-management-team

The board are all politicos, civil servant, lawyery types. I'm surprised, I thought they'd be more medically backgrounded.

Its terrible @RedToothBrush.

I don’t understand why as SoS for Health Wes can’t compel them to rectify this.

Worse you can continue to sexually assault female patients who specifically request a female dr with gmc backing and cover because they say he is a female dr

I need to sign the petition. If I behaved like that in my office, stroking a man’s leg etc I would be out.

I suspect if the doctor had stroked a man's leg etc he'd be out too. Men have rights, women are entertainment.

It wouldn't have been the GMC that concluded he was fit to practice, but the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service - separate organisation.

As I understand it (not a doctor) GMC regulates and investigates, imposes interim restrictions and takes cases to the MPTS. They're the equivalent of the CPS, taking a case to court. They can't affect the outcome.

This must be generally known, esp to people in professions such as medicine. We may see a concerted effort to be allowed to change NI numbers as well. When one loophole closes they open another one.

Isnt this all because TRAs claimed the right to a private life, on the basis that they are undetectable as women. So no one would know, and therefore you had to eliminate any possible circumstances under which they might be 'outed' as men.

It's obviously not fit for purpose. You can't claim no one knows you're a bloke, when everyone knows it and you know they know it, because you're claiming trans rights, on the back of it!

This. These men are using it as a power trip, rather than going "stealth".

On the basis criminal records, medical records etc are all also scrubbed because new NI numbers and NHS no are issued when a GRC is enacted - it is all shocking. If people really want to change their name, fine, but NI/NHS/Porfessional registration numbers should follow the individual regardless of name and gender changes. This should always have been the case.

rebeccasaysno on twitter has done lots of work on the GMA and the capture of doctors and their institutions generally.

Interestingly a comment on the Telegraph points out that if you change your name for other reasons (presumably in this case for reasons of reverting to Islam but possible through an islamic marriage) you do not get to erase your history. It’s just a perk of transgenderism. This is the link posted there to show how Dr Victoria Pickles, once she had become Dr Maryam Mohamed al Qureshi, did not get to erase the transgression committed in her former name.

https://www.mpts-uk.org/-/media/mpts-rod-files/dr-maryam-mohamed-al-qureshi-10-sep-24.pdf

Another Telegraph article, apparently even the hospitals hiring these characters can't see their disciplinary records

https://archive.ph/0vYeN

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/21/nhs-hospitals-hiring-trans-doctors-disciplinary-records/

Eta link and rogue apostrophe

People who are put into witness protection in the UK don't get a new birth certificate, NHS number or NI number literally the only people who get a completely new identity in the UK are trans people.
Even the sleep deprived new mother who didn't notice that the registrar wrongly recorded her baby daughter as a M male on her birth certificate can only get an amended birth certificate instead of a new/correct 1 issued

Is there a plan from the gov to change this?

A few words by Streeting but what next?

I just read that Daily Mail article about the rogue gynae guy. There was a time tapping on a Mail article left me reaching for the hand sanitizer but not anymore.
I'm informed in the piece that a spokesman for Southend hospital was at pains to reassure 'women and all birthing people' that they take safeguarding seriously. You can relax now ladies.

You can relax now ladies.

Surely you meant "ladies and non-lady birthing people".

The GMC will now link the disciplinary records further public to see but will remove the old name and pronouns from the records

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/22/disciplinary-records-trans-doctors-will-be-public-gmc-nhs/

Before we get too enamoured of the value of a National Insurance number as a unique identifier, it's worth pointing out that it is perfectly possible to have more than one. I do. Apparently, when I was around 16 I was issued with one but my mother hid it and didn't tell me. Accordingly, when I was of an age to want things like work and benefits I was under the impression I didn't have one, so applied for an NI number and was issued with one. I thought I'd somehow slipped trough the net because we moved house a lot when I was young. It was only when she died that I found my original one among my mother's personal effects. So that's how you can end up with two NI numbers. I've never used it to swap identities or succeeded in monetising this in any way. But let's not make too many assumptions about it being unique or that people only have one of them!

The GMC will now link the disciplinary records further public to see but will remove the old name and pronouns from the records

Well, it's a start, but it's still not good enough.

I wonder why your mother hid it - it seems very odd.