Michelle Dewbery on GB News discussing single sex spaces with reference to the NHS nurses case

[NonCrimeHakeIncident]

https://x.com/BevJacksonAuth/status/1883082021918183482

I just wanted to share this. It’s nothing new discussion wise but it’s a bit like the Staniland question where you never get an answer. Props to Michelle for not letting it go and bringing in the nurses case.

Thought it was interesting that one of his other 'deeply held sentiments' is 'no police at pride'.

How's that supposed to work? What follows from it? Queer people should police themselves? Queer people don't folllow cis laws? Suggests that inspite of his appearance, his politics are well outside the mainstream.

Yes, it was. Thanks.

Dewbs and Virgin Active

https://x.com/michelledewbs/status/1900644239601455423?s=46&t=FIU1cJd7lLuiNrdKvRijmA

Excellent repeated use of the word "member" there!

Also I like the comment underneath - "still got a wicket, you ain't got a ticket" (if not the rest of it)

Keep going Michelle. Hope to see a lot more of this plainspeaking common sense and truth. Once women in the spotlight of our media realise they can be honest and truthful in speaking out without being cancelled, more will follow.

@borogovia usually that sentiment is about not wanting off-duty officers to attend Pride in uniform/doing anything else (eg carrying a banner) to indicate they’re police.

Of course, when they’re NOT allowed to attend in uniform people kick off too.

(Archive version of article linked above.)

Please keep going Michelle. I don’t care for GB news generally but you are spot on. Companies that are in the public sector are rightly under increasing scrutiny right now with the Sandie Peggie case, but the private sector that have cut and pasted the policy you mention and so liberally issued it in their companies is so wrong, and women cannot often speak out for fear of falling foul of the DEI stuff. Thank you Michelle! (Hope you’re on here!)

The Black Belt Barrister has filmed a YouTube on this

j

The parliamentary guidance/explanations on exemptions seem extremely clear. I don't understand how it's reached the supreme Court.

One reason he doesn't consider as to why Virgin Active have the policy they do is fear. Not of court action, that's what we do. We do things legally although tras will keep that in their/them's back pocket. They're afraid of pickets, vandalism, twitter pile ons, of the young 'woke' staff they employ, of some fuckwit 'influencer' scolding them. Look at the pile on the young woman who's set up a woman only gym is experiencing. They frightened of, probably, a tm (the tw shock troops) filming being told the rules by a polite receptionist.

Incidentally, I understand why he does it, it's the same fear I describe above, but I wish he'd stop apologising every five seconds. Words aren't violence.

GB News have reliably and relentlessly covered the issues of women's rights and child safeguarding since their launch. Almost every (publicly GC) woman (and man) in this fight has been given airtime on there and 90% of their presenters are, in my opinion, on the side of sanity, particularly the women, like Michelle, Nana, Miriam, Olivia, Emily, and Camilla. Andrew Doyle's Free Speech Nation was unmissable on Sunday nights.

If the so-called mainstream media (BBC, ITV, Sky) had been even half as fair as GB News has been, the general public would be far more aware of what is going on and I think we would have made faster progress.

Frankly, the BBC looks absolutely ridiculous when it boasts of being impartial, and the commercial channels such as ITV and Sky get away with broadcasting flat out lies on GC issues.

Well said. The MSM have openly lied, have repeatedly ignored so many sex offenders - how much coverage of the appalling Surrey Pride paedophile conviction this week has there been? And much of that is because of self interest. Presumably it's the embarrassment of being evidently culpable for gaslighting the public and children and - yet again - ignoring issues relating to safeguarding children and women in favour of cosying up to their mates in the powerful rainbow lobby.

Thanks for the link 👍

I agree: I’m glad he’s discussing these issues more often but I also wish he’d be less tentative. But I think he has to keep on the right side of the Bar standards and oversight organisation who are firmly TWAW.