Actually, thank you for answering my question. I'm more than happy to engage in productive, respectful dialogue.
Of those three people I've met with a presentation of classic transexuality, one is a trans woman and the other two are trans men.
I wasn't just present in their lives at one point, I still am, and these are my friends. Of course I've listened to their lived experiences, with compassion and respect.
I've had many productive, friendly conversations with them. I'll be spending my NYE with one of them and his fiancée. I guess I should hand in my terf card.
And through the many conversations I've had with them, which they initiated rather than me, they were very clear that someone with autism, or other deep-seated psychiatric issues, would never be a classic example of transexuality, and certainly not a candidate for transition related medical procedures.
You do apparently claim to have a classic presentation as well, but also apparently don't show much regard for safeguarding, which, to me, stands in contrast with what my friends think.
You don't really address the special circumstances in this case, autism and other psychiatric problems, but rather just speak about your own experience. This really isn't of much help to OP or the child she is talking about. I really don't understand why you'd do that, though I'm open to hear your arguments.
allowed her to successfully address her dysphoria and enter adult society not only with a gender-congruent presentation, but one that other people find quite attractive.
This sort of statement, along with the bet on who could bed you in Uni, do sound a bit unreal.