Unite branch LE127 represents UCU staff and are in dispute with UCU. One of the issues raised is the lack of a gender identity policy for UCU's own staff. Sources:
Could UCU's unwillingness to "walk the walk" be because UCU are happy to arm-bend others into adopting the legally-dubious¥ (and also mysteriously now missing, with only dead links on the website)
template policies from AdvanceHE (pdf),but don't want to take the risk of being taken to tribunal themselves?
¥ "Think of the person as being the gender that they self-identify as" being an example of legally-dubious overreach because it's not acceptable to try to tell someone what to think.