Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Calling women ‘birds’ is sexual harassment, judge rules

0 replies

IwantToRetire · 03/10/2024 20:25

The judgment came in the case of a high-end whisky investment company which has been ordered to pay more than £50,000 in compensation to a female staff member who complained about the language used by her colleagues.

Nina Chung claimed at an employment tribunal that her co-workers at Whisky 1901, opposite Harrods in Knightsbridge, London, called women “birds” and boasted about their “sexual conquests”.

She was also asked if she was planning on getting pregnant by a colleague, who, in another incident, locked her out of the company’s office, the tribunal heard.

Employment Judge Pavel Klimov ruled that her complaints amounted to sex harassment.

Start of an artice at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/03/calling-women-birds-sex-harassment-judge-rules/

Also readable at Calling women ‘birds’ is sexual harassment, judge rules (archive.ph)

NB! Thread title is Telegraph title

Calling women ‘birds’ is sexual harassment, judge rules

Female worker claims colleagues boasted about ‘sexual conquests’ in office, tribunal hears

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/03/calling-women-birds-sex-harassment-judge-rules

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page