This is a good summary of the position some women are in when they need reassurance around particular issues. I'm pleased this has been so useful for Smith Galer. I share her concerns about the trade-off she had to make about her medical privacy and the reality that many women could afford neither the ring nor the monthly subscription.
SG wove in the reality of the under-researched women's health issues. This connects to other threads about women's health in FWR at present. I'm also interested in this being headlined as "where the NHS has failed" as it may say something interesting about expectations of what the NHS can provide.
I now feel 10 times better about my personal health because I had the disposable income to secure better information than I’d have been able to achieve going through the nation’s healthcare system; anyone who doesn’t have hundreds of pounds to spare simply cannot find the same relief as quickly or at all.
To get such information, I also had to be happy sharing private healthcare information with a tech company. I currently feel like this is an easy decision to make, given reproductive rights and freedoms in the UK are, generally speaking, a lot better than in other countries.
I welcome a growth in healthtech and made the decision this year that having more information about my body currently overrides my worries about sharing the data with companies in the first place. As a woman, I have an under-researched body – even though one in three women in the UK will suffer from a reproductive or gynaecological health issue in their lives, less than 2.5 per cent of publicly funded research is dedicated solely to reproductive health. I crave any information on it that I can get. This is also behind my decision to buy an Oura ring, a piece of smart jewellery that tracks my sleep and movement.
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/trust-oura-ring-more-doctor-3226588?