Possible world wide ramifications of the Tickle v Giggle ruling.

[TheywontletmehavethenameIwant]

Here's an article that comes to a very depressing conclusion.

Australia has abolished womanhood - spiked (spiked-online.com)

"What ought to send a shiver down the spine of all right-thinking people is that this ruling could have huge ramifications for those in other countries across the globe. The Convention to Eliminate All forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the UN. It is an agreement that recognises the specific needs of women. Giggle’s defence argued that Australia’s ratification of CEDAW obliges the state to protect women’s rights, including single-sex spaces. That Justice Bromwich rejected this will have ramifications for the 186 countries that have ratified CEDAW, as judges across the world look to landmark rulings like this to inform domestic decisions."

Mr Menno has put this out 😂

This sadly is confirmation of my own instinct.

It's fashionable for metro elitists to sneer at 'Barry the Gammon' and his missus and all the other Barrys out there but guess what? Barry may not have a uni degree but he doesn't fucking need one to know that the Emperor is bollock naked and that a woman can't have a penis. The folk who traditionally voted for the left have been abandoned by the left. Now the chickens are coming home to roost.

Mr Menno is the best.

Only found this thread after I came across Mr Menno's always on point vid on FB. That's a couple of the most chilling paragraphs I've read in a long time, @StealthSpinach . This is the end-game. This is what they want. And why they can't be allowed to win. I would be despairing if I was an Aussie.

I’m hoping the FWS hearing at the U.K. Supreme Court will cast some more light on the importance of the meaning of key words. At some point I am hoping a senior court will state the bloody obvious that biological sex is a thing and that sometimes it really really matters.

If we are lucky it could have a Cass like impact where the grown ups start driving the narrative again based on facts.

@TheywontletmehavethenameIwant
Watching all the interviews Sall has done since, I am as cautiously optimistic as she is.
As she has said multiple times she expected to lose this one because it was the letter of the law being judged, despite the law being an ass in this instance.

As to the fine of $AUS 10,000, she ruefully admitted on Glinner that was down to the fact that she laughed outloud in court at seeing a photo of him...

Me too, hopefully with all the publicity that's been generated and the fact that she comes over very well in all the interviews I've seen, round 2 will go a different way.

Because the ruling might have implications for an international treaty, maybe the government will take an interest and start realising how much legislation they've passed is batshit crazy.