Don't the football clubs and some of the festivals have to pay the police for security?
Wont explain the circumstances in which I asked this, but at an "event" I noticed a huge number of police which seemed disproportionate to what was actually happening.
So I asked a group of police who were just standing around chatting to each other, and they said its based on some sort of forumula, expected crowd size X = Y number of police. Many of them on over time and from other police forces.
And, dont wont this to seem a derail, but wonder if the police are using this blanket formula to generate income and get over time for officers.
But back to the claim in the article headline.
What we need are actual facts eg
Number of reported instance of rape
Number of actual investigation
Number of investigations then sent to the CPS
Number of cases the CPS actually takes to court
Quite honestly as far as I can see it makes no difference if "experienced" police officers are investigating. There is no evidence that the investigation of reported rapes has actually changed.
And if it is true, then it says something not just about the police, but the general public, that they would prioritise policing events for public enjoyment over investigations of a crime.
Can you imagine football fans or fesitival goers being told their event wont go ahead, or only for a reduced number, because the "correct" number of police cant be made available because they are investigating actual crimes? Let alone crimes against women?