i think the stupidity is worrying, the ill-informed bluster is worrying too - it’s not as if you can’t find out exactly how various types of so-called SRS work with a quick google. But also I think this illustrates the total confusion going on.
When gender ideologists want us to say that not only women have a cervix, the group the must be trying to defend are trans men. They think TWAW so they can’t be talking about TW. They mean it’s wrong to say a man can’t have a cervix, because a TM can, and a TM can get pregnant etc, hence the campaign against talking about women and mothers etc in maternity services.
But some people don’t get this and because they know TW to be men (though they are trying to deny that) they think this means TW have a cervix. In other words, not just women have a cervix because TW (ie men) do too! Then they get all bogged down in trying to claim males can grow or somehow gain a cervix.
india willoughby famously responded to keir starmer saying it’s wrong to say only women have a cervix, by offering to show IW’s own cervix to Andrew Marr. But the issue has nothing to do with IW or TW at all, it’s about TM.
Both India and Lammy are clearly showing they think of TW as men, and trying to argue that men can get themselves a cervix. If Lammy wanted to support “trans rights” and GI he’d be saying that of course men can have a cervix as trans men often do.