polyglotter the email to parents basically said, as you’d expect, due to the current political environment there’s a lot more to the story than what is on the press, we and our regulator spent ages investigating and nothing of note was found wrong, we’re in the clear, thanks for your support.
I mean yes, there is a lot more to the story but does the school really want me to start highlighting that my son was told “in confidence” that his sister was now a boy at school and how they lied to the regulator saying they’d tried to get us to meet to discuss the clinical advice/social services decision but no luck, when in fact there’s an email trail of us (multiple times) agreeing to meet and just being ignored. It’s a shame the regulator didn’t have any issues with the school’s processes (he doesn’t investigate individual cases, just the underlying policies) and went with the fact that the school follows the ScotGov guidance (which was not in place at the time).
They can spin however they want but I have a war chest of documented evidence.