This is also worth highlighting for anyone who doesn't want to click on the link:
Why have I suddenly acquired such ovaries of tungsten? Three reasons.
First, because my “lived experience” of Willoughby was that she said things that she dearly wishes were true when they were not, which I contend is a central tenet of trans ideology.
Second, because the Scottish Hate Crime Act came in this week, which means north of the border you can be accused of stirring up hatred even in your own home because of race, religion, age, orientation and transgender identity, but not on the basis of sex: ergo a man who says he is a woman has more protection in law than a natural-born woman.
As you will know, on April Fool’s Day, JK Rowling killed this inept and McCarthyite law dead on arrival in a surgical strike with a series of lethal tweets in the course of which she called a bunch of trans women men.
“Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the freedoms and rights of actual women and girls,” she explained, and her truth went around the world before the accepted lie had put its kinky boots on.
Third, because Willoughby then accused the Harry Potter author of “grotesque” transphobia and doubled down on a previous post saying “I’m more of a woman than JK Rowling will ever be.” At this point I might remind readers Willoughby has fathered children, and the Oxford English definition of a male is “the sex that can beget but not bear offspring”.