Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sarah Phillimore Disinvited by Bristol University

12 replies

ChristinaXYZ · 12/03/2024 19:52

Sarah Phillimore was asked to speak about the challenges she have as a disabled barrister but seems to have been disinvited for her gender critical views.

https://twitter.com/SVPhillimore/status/1767506904228499552

She posts her letter to the relevant Minster, Robert Halfron, in the thread below.

There is some suggestion that it might be because of not enough days to arrange security but as she says, she would have been offered a rearranged date if that was the case.

https://twitter.com/SVPhillimore/status/1767506904228499552

OP posts:
donquixotedelamancha · 12/03/2024 20:01

Sarah Phillimore is incredibly tenacious and fiercely intelligent. This was a significant error on their part.

HoneyButterPopcorn · 12/03/2024 20:04

A dangerous woman indeed…🙄🙄

Karensalright · 12/03/2024 20:07

They are clearly fibbing about the reasons

BlackeyedSusan · 12/03/2024 21:51

Oh dear. That's not going to end well for them.

AvacadoFieldsForever · 12/03/2024 22:25

The optics of banning a disabled female barrister!

Silly fuckers.

mb2512cat · 12/03/2024 22:26

She blocked me over pronouns-gate so my sympathies are hard to muster.

Karensalright · 12/03/2024 22:37

@mb2512cat well we cannot all agree about all the details surely you can see what side she is on?

Woman2023 · 12/03/2024 22:57

I have the utmost respect for Sarah, she always defends her own views. She's exactly the sort of person universities should be inviting to speak.

Dontblameitonsunshine · 13/03/2024 00:57

Sarah is brilliant and I bet she will embarrass Bristol for this very unforced error.

BoreOfWhabylon · 13/03/2024 10:23

Big mistake, Bristol. Huge.

ChristinaXYZ · 13/03/2024 11:41

I hope they back track and invite her to speak.

OP posts:
Datun · 13/03/2024 13:10

I thought it had already been established that threats of violence from staff, employees, or probably in this case, students, were not a sufficient reason to discriminate against someone for their gender critical views?

i'm not on Twitter, is she planning on taking this any further?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page