Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Gender critical feminism is a misnomer. There is nothing critical about what they do.

26 replies

IwantToRetire · 23/02/2024 01:29

“Gender critical feminism is a misnomer. There is nothing critical about what they do. Critical relates to intervention. It’s not negative. Critical theory is inquiry into taken for granted presumptions in order to imagine a different world.” Judith Butler #LSEAHRCGender
https://twitter.com/hashtag/lseahrcgender

Shocked to find that the LSE didn't extend an invitation to FWR to this event that happened earlier today Shock

Transnational anti-gender politics and resistance

As 'anti-gender' movements become more prominent globally, we ask Judith Butler and feminist activist Tooba Syed to share histories and forms of resistance.

What might feminist, queer and decolonial forms of resistance teach us about diverse forms of 'anti-gender' backlash? How can we generate political solidarity to counter 'anti-gender' mobilisations across different contexts? Our keynote speakers will reflect on political, epistemic and ethical interventions and open up for discussion with the audience.

https://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2024/02/202402221730/politics

For those who cant wait to be (re) educated available to watch at

Transnational anti-gender politics and resistance

5.30pm Thurs 22 Feb | Judith Butler, Tooba Syed | Registration Required | Free public event at LSE

https://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2024/02/202402221730/politics

OP posts:
DrBlackbird · 24/02/2024 08:41

"Gender critical feminism is a misnomer. There is nothing critical about what they do. Critical relates to intervention. It’s not negative. Critical theory is inquiry into taken for granted presumptions in order to imagine a different world.”

She is not doing a great job of criticising the gender critical position that she thinks she is going by her own definition.

What is the GC position if not trying to make a positive intervention? Doesn’t Judith agree that stopping children and teens from a lifetime of harmful medication that results in crumbling bones and loss of fertility and sexual pleasure seems quite a positive aim? That encouraging children to accept and love their bodies and not conform to regressive and sexist stereotypes is positive?

Moreover, GC imagines a world where women retain their safety, dignity and privacy along with their very hard fought rights to single sex spaces and a world where men don’t take their sports medals or political short lists or insist on sexually assaulted woman submit to the coercive control of men with a fetish. Does Judith truly believe those are negative aims?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread