Rats deserting the sinking ship?

[BethDuttonsTwin]

I’ve included the screenshot for those who don’t want to click the DM link. No where else has published it yet.

my questions are, has he been forced into liquidation due to financial issues or has he realised he backed the wrong horse?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12810657/amp/World-leading-transgender-surgery-specialist-dubbed-Snapchat-Surgeon-performing-ops-social-media-puts-Mayfair-clinic-liquidation.html

Ooh, this feels like big news. I wonder what will come out in the coming weeks.

Being sued?

He live-streamed surgeries on SnapChat? JFC!

If he's got patients lining up, who are disappointed he's left, it doesn't sound like it can be because work has dried up.

Curiouser and curiouser.

It’s the first time I’ve ever heard about a private clinic going into liquidation…..
It has to be a HUGE issue

He live-streamed surgeries on SnapChat? JFC!

My thoughts too!

Maya just posted this on X.

Is this the same doctor?
From 2022
The Tribunal has now found Christopher Inglefield's fitness to practise is impaired by reason of misconduct, liying about reporting an incident to the CQC.

The serious incident related to a patient who lost sight in one eye after a facial "feminisation" operation.

https://twitter.com/tribunaltweets/status/1598337237992849410

“The serious incident related to a patient who lost sight in one eye after a facial "feminisation" operation.”

that is horrific.

Whatever the issue with the CQC, it won't be them waking up to the harms of gender surgery. They have drunk the Kool-Aid by the gallon.

This is very interesting.

The clinic is still listed on Companies House website, with Inglefield showing as 'Active', although I imagine if takes time for the website to be updated.

Christopher Inglefield, had previously been warned by the General Medical Council for not obtaining consent forms from patients. In 2016, Dr Inglefield was given a 5 year written warning for repeated failure to properly complete surgical consent forms. He failed to record details & made revisions forms that weren't countersigned by the patient, who had a series of cosmetic breast procedures.

All this makes me think this guy is very vulnerable to law suits. Whether he was being sued and he was ducking out before he loses a case or if there is some other illegal activity he is trying to escape from who knows,

If I'm reading this correctly, Inglefield (who is listed as a consultant cosmetic surgeon at Companies House) performed mastectomies and also facial feminisation surgery, one of the latter cases resulting in him being suspended for one month..

Is it odd for one surgeon to do both mastectomies and FFS? I'm not at all sure it sounds like a good idea.

There’s nothing on the Gazette, which is much more up to date than Companies House. I’d be interested to see the form of liquidation - voluntary, forced by creditors or enforced by the Official Receiver (the insolvency practitioner of last resort when a company has no funds left to pay anyone else). But there isn’t a formal notice or an announcement of the appointment of a liquidator.

Hmm.

Is it odd for one surgeon to do both mastectomies and FFS? I'm not at all sure it sounds like a good idea.

It would be very unusual these days for a surgeon to do mastectomies for cancer as well as facial surgery, but plastic surgeons do do breast reconstructions. Removing non-cancerous breast tissue is probably within a plastic surgeon's skill-set, as it's not really that different from other forms of plastic surgery. So I wouldn't say this is a huge red flag, though I'm not a surgeon - surgeons might disagree.

I would say that live-streaming your ops, even with full consent and if you're the best surgeon on Earth, is asking to be sued. * *

Maya pointed out on twitter another element in this lost income from the NHS:

"This is the clinic whose brand ambassador Eva Echo brought a Judicial Review against NHS (supported by the Good Law Project). If won it would have led to NHS having to commission more.

Guess they were banking on it."

This was the case that failed appeal in September:
https://www.landmarkchambers.co.uk/news-and-cases/court-finds-waiting-times-for-gender-identity-health-services-that-breach-nhs-targets-give-rise-to-no-legal-remedy#:~:text=A%20group%20of%20claimants%20consisting,that%20these%20delays%20were%20unlawful.

This was in fact one of the Good Law Projects scam cases which are pretty much doomed from the outset [according to honest lawyers] but meant Joly Fox killer always gets paid.

I saw something about this on twitter last week a ftm was really upset because her mastectomy was supposed to be done this week and the correspondence from the Dr basically blamed the hospital that he operates in, saying it had cancelled all his surveys and he was trying to find somewhere else that he could operate. I guess that he couldn't find anywhere else.
My question is why did the hospital stop this dr operating in their hospital when he will have been paying them to use their surgical facilities and private post surgical rooms 🤔

Thanks for the explanation, Miss Lucy.

The DM article says the staff at the clinic were made redundant the day before pay day. There was no money to pay them. If he was paying to use a hospital's facilities, then he'd presumably have no money to fund that either. And there'd be no point in having a consultation with a surgeon who couldn't carry out the surgery.

Thanks, I'd missed that element of the JR. Plastic surgeons try to force the NHS to pay them for care.

Right side if history, my arse.

He is also an exponent of womb transplants, claiming the contentious procedure is 'essentially identical' to that of 'cis-women' – females born in that gender.
Last year Mr Inglefield said: 'This pioneering birth is extremely important for any trans female who would like to carry her own child.
'Because once the medical community accept this as a treatment for cis-women with uterine infertility, such as the congenital absence of a womb, then it would be illegal to deny a trans-female who has completed her transition.
'There are clearly anatomical boundaries when it comes to trans women but these are problems that I believe can be surmounted and the transplant into a trans-female is essentially identical to that of a cis-female.'

He's a surgeon who doesn't live in reality. I'm not surprised he ended up ruining a patient's eyesight. Ego so huge he thinks he can work miracles and that attitude is likely to result in misplaced confidence whilst undertaking procedures.

Also, bear in mind that Inglefield us a surgeon and not a lawyer, so I wouldn't pay too much heed to his view that it would be illegal to refuse to implant a uterus into a tw.

He has no idea, nor do I. It'd go to court, I expect, with all of us fighting it tooth & nail.

'There are clearly anatomical boundaries when it comes to trans women but these are problems that I believe can be surmounted and the transplant into a trans-female is essentially identical to that of a cis-female.'

How deluded or corrupt does a surgeon have to be to make that statement? They really seem to have siloed thinking that pregnancy is only about a uterus. How the fuck is he thinking he can jury-rig or transplant an endocrine system to monitor foetal development with naturally formed hormones and components? Or is he simply thinking a human is an engineering project that can be built with only artificial components with no adverse impact? FFS.

When I read The Island of Doctor Moreau, I was horrified and taken aback at the nature of what can only be described as sadistic violence inflicted on the victims by Dr Moreau and Well’s graphic language describing it. Written in 1896; but now it seems it was tragically prescient writing.

He sounds like a fucking lunatic. And one that doesn't actually understand the inner workings of the human body. Did he even study medicine or did he read Mary Shelley for inspiration and get a certificate to practice medicine off the dark web 🤯