Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Court cases/Judicial Reviews/ET/ETAs

253 replies

ArabellaScott · 02/10/2023 12:07

A thread of court cases involving people with 'gender critical' beliefs. So they are all in one place. I'll try and add links to court judgements where I can find them.

I'll add cases as I have time but please feel free to add others and/or remind me of any I've missed!

  1. Maria McLachlan, Tara Wolf. Assault by beating/battery.

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/04/27/trans-identified-male-tara-wolf-charged-assault-hyde-park-attack/

'Tara Wolf (also known as Tara Flik Wood), a trans-identified male, stood trial for striking 60-year-old Maria MacLachlan three times in Hyde Park on September 13th 2017, where women had gathered to attend a meeting called “We Need to Talk About Gender” at a yet-to-be-disclosed location. Wolf was found guilty of “assault by beating,” more commonly known as “battery.”'

Trans-identified male, Tara Wolf, convicted of assault after Hyde Park attack

Jen Izaakson reports from the courtroom, as Tara Wolf is tried for assaulting Maria MacLachlan.

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/04/27/trans-identified-male-tara-wolf-charged-assault-hyde-park-attack

OP posts:
Thread gallery
82
SinnerBoy · 23/02/2025 13:51

I agree, Eresh It seems ironic that they - as you say - managed to lose on both sides. I wonder if they'll apply their lessons and sort their disciplinary procedures out?

Signalbox · 25/02/2025 13:05

Ryan Castellucci has lost his appeal to be recognised as non-binary in UK law...

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Castellucci-v-Gender-Recognition-Panel.pdf

Court cases/Judicial Reviews/ET/ETAs
Harassedevictee · 25/02/2025 14:08

@Signalbox that is good news.

Signalbox · 22/03/2025 08:04

Peter Wilkins v Porton Down Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL)

As a scientist at Porton Down developing technology to secure Britain’s defences, Peter Wilkins never imagined he would be considered a threat because of a belief in biology.

But when he stated his gender-critical views and support for the concept of immutable sex, Wilkins was reported for his “ideology” and labelled by colleagues as transphobic, “sad and pathetic” and “a rubbish employee”.

An employment tribunal has found there was a “clear hostile animus” towards gender-critical beliefs at the top-secret Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL). It found that an intimidating atmosphere resulted in the harassment and discrimination of Wilkins, 43, who was forced to leave as a result….

https://www.thetimes.com/article/1c23cb7b-f144-4e57-8ab0-f9fc45ba7853?shareToken=2b6ead68d247452a896839234bda5d0d

Archive…

https://archive.ph/5exEA

Porton Down scientist forced out over gender beliefs wins legal battle

The tribunal found a ‘clear hostile animus’ towards Peter Wilkins, who worked at Porton Down, expressed gender-critical views

https://www.thetimes.com/article/1c23cb7b-f144-4e57-8ab0-f9fc45ba7853?shareToken=2b6ead68d247452a896839234bda5d0d

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 22/03/2025 08:38

'Senior officials failed to address the behaviour because of an "unblinking desire" to support the pro-
trans lobby'.

'Senior staff did not stop the harassment, the tribunal found. Management viewed Prism, the DSTL sexual orientation and gender identity network, "as a powerful force within the organisation and were loath to do anything to go against [or] upset that body".'

Well, you could knock me down with a feather! 🙄

I think I'm going to have a heart attack and die, from not surprise.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 22/03/2025 09:38

Signalbox · 22/03/2025 08:04

Peter Wilkins v Porton Down Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL)

As a scientist at Porton Down developing technology to secure Britain’s defences, Peter Wilkins never imagined he would be considered a threat because of a belief in biology.

But when he stated his gender-critical views and support for the concept of immutable sex, Wilkins was reported for his “ideology” and labelled by colleagues as transphobic, “sad and pathetic” and “a rubbish employee”.

An employment tribunal has found there was a “clear hostile animus” towards gender-critical beliefs at the top-secret Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL). It found that an intimidating atmosphere resulted in the harassment and discrimination of Wilkins, 43, who was forced to leave as a result….

https://www.thetimes.com/article/1c23cb7b-f144-4e57-8ab0-f9fc45ba7853?shareToken=2b6ead68d247452a896839234bda5d0d

Archive…

https://archive.ph/5exEA

Fantastic! Any link to the judgment, it doesn’t seem to be in the article. I’ll have a poke about later but travelling at the moment.

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 22/03/2025 09:41

I've just checked Bailii, and i can't see the judgement there yet.

BettyBooper · 22/03/2025 13:42

Just adding this here. Christian teacher sacked for saying LGBTQ+ a sin loses ET.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1lpy95y089o.amp

'The PCP hearing was told that Ms Leger's comments were recorded by an 11-year-old pupil, who had been advised by her mother to note down any "transphobic" remarks.
The mother then complained to the school, saying Ms Leger's comments were "very distressing" for her child.'

Blurred stock image of pupils in a class

Christian teacher loses court case over LGBT+ 'sin' comments - BBC News

Glawdys Leger challenged a ruling of unprofessional conduct over comments made to pupils in Bromley.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1lpy95y089o.amp

Signalbox · 25/03/2025 22:24

“An English university [Uni of Sussex] is set to be fined a record £585,000 over allegations it failed to uphold free speech and academic freedom, in a landmark ruling in the debate over student rights on campus.”

https://www.ft.com/content/d39f0db7-877a-4cf3-8c12-dd5581eecd0b

Archive

https://archive.is/yHVnG

England’s university regulator issues record fine in Sussex free speech case

Policies intended to prevent abuse or harassment of certain groups on campus had created ‘a chilling effect’, OfS says

https://www.ft.com/content/d39f0db7-877a-4cf3-8c12-dd5581eecd0b

NoBinturongsHereMate · 25/03/2025 22:30

Just saw that in the news, Signal. Half a million just for Doc Stock (and a discount for being the first one).

The OU must be feeling rather nervous.

SaffronSpice · 26/03/2025 22:20

NoBinturongsHereMate · 25/03/2025 22:30

Just saw that in the news, Signal. Half a million just for Doc Stock (and a discount for being the first one).

The OU must be feeling rather nervous.

Edited

Just to be clear, in case someone misunderstands, Doc Stock does not receive the money.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 26/03/2025 22:22

Yes, I should have phrased that as 'for what they did to Doc Stock'.

Signalbox · 16/04/2025 21:16
Fireworks GIF

16th April 2025
FWS (Appellant) v Scottish Ministers (Respondent)
Appeal Allowed.

https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0042_press_summary_8a42145662.pdf

ArabellaScott · 16/04/2025 21:54

Bless you Signalbox!

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 24/04/2025 10:25

https://open.substack.com/pub/tribunaltweets/p/sentinel-volume-8

A round up here from the fantastic Tribunal Tweets, of various court cases and open letters, etc.

OP posts:
Signalbox · 28/04/2025 21:22

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/c1k4gd2vge9o.amp

Pinches said she was part of a group of players launching their own legal action against the WEPF and UPG over rules forcing them to play transgender women.

In a statement, the Women in Pool group, which includes Pinches, said: "This is the result of 15 months of legal action which we have been pursuing against Ultimate Pool and against the World Eightball Pool Federation.

"At our instruction, our lawyers informed the two pool bodies' lawyers that we would be prepared to forego litigation if experts could be jointly instructed to determine whether or not the sport of pool was "a gender-affected" activity as defined in the Equality Act 2010.

"We are pleased that this strategy has succeeded, and that Ultimate Pool has now changed its rules as we had sought."

A player takes a shot during a game of pool

Transgender women banned from female pool category - BBC Sport

The Ultimate Pool Group (UPG) ban transgender women from female category after landmark UK Supreme Court ruling that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/c1k4gd2vge9o.amp

ArabellaScott · 26/05/2025 15:41

https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/a-v-nottinghamshire-county-council-2600413-slash-2023

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gre53drqvo

Teacher v Nottinghamshire CC

'A Christian teacher who was sacked after accessing a transgender child's safeguarding report and transcribing it to her personal computer has lost an unfair dismissal and religious discrimination claim.
The teacher, who cannot be named and has been referred to as A, refused after being asked by the Nottinghamshire County Council-run school to refer to the child with a male name and pronouns at the parents' request.
She was suspended from her role as a teacher in September 2021 as a row over how she should refer to the child continued.
A year later - after briefly returning to teach at the school - she was sacked after the school discovered she had been accessing the child's private files.
Claims that A had been subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure, automatic unfair dismissal, ordinary unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, direct religion or belief discrimination, and harassment related to religion or belief were all dismissed by the employment tribunal.'

A v Nottinghamshire County Council: 2600413/2023

Employment Tribunal decision.

https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/a-v-nottinghamshire-county-council-2600413-slash-2023

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 29/05/2025 11:34

Ursula Doyle v Hachette - settled

'I have reached a settlement in my case against Hachette for discrimination on the grounds of my gender-critical beliefs.

Hachette and I have agreed that we will keep the terms of the settlement confidential except for the information I am sharing in this statement. In bringing this case, I hoped to demonstrate conclusively that employers cannot allow staff to be subjected to abuse because of their lawful views, nor ignore women’s rights to single-sex spaces. Most importantly of all, I wanted the tribunal to scrutinise the company’s Trans Inclusion and Transitioning at Work Policy, which I strongly believe is discriminatory and unlawful. While the company has not admitted liability, I am pleased it has confirmed to me as part of discussions regarding my case that it will be conducting a review of its applicable policies including its Trans Inclusion and Transitioning at Work Policy within the next three months to consider whether any changes need to be made.

The last five years have been taxing – emotionally, professionally and, latterly, financially. My health and my peace of mind have both suffered. I am sad that I no longer have the job that brought me great satisfaction and enabled me to publish some brilliant books and work with some brilliant authors and colleagues; nothing can make up for that. What has kept me going is the importance of the principles at stake, and the incredible support I have had from everyone who has so generously shared and contributed to the crowdfunder and written me such encouraging messages of solidarity.

The battle for sex realism continues. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in the For Women Scotland case, I am hopeful that UK employers are beginning to realise that a policy they might have adopted in good faith and with the best intentions might have unforeseen consequences which harm women. I am more grateful than I can say for your support. I would never have got this far without it.'

Ursula's case in a nutshell:

'In 2021 I published Kathleen Stock’s influential book on sex and gender, Material Girls. Since then, I have been a target for abuse by colleagues in the book industry, who have used social media to accuse me of - among other things - bigotry, prejudice, transphobia and hatred, often tagging in my employer, Hachette, and Hachette’s Pride network.
Hachette have done nothing to protect me, and have created a hostile working environment for me and anyone else who shares my views. When two of Fleet's authors complained that my views were transphobic, the company agreed to move paperback editions of the authors' books away from the imprint to another part of the business, damaging my reputation both inside and outside the company. I became ill with stress and associated conditions, and finally resigned. I am bringing a claim of discrimination on the grounds of my gender-critical belief (sometimes known as 'sex realism'), and of sex discrimination.'

A short film about the case:

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2SAtNFZxWw

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 09/06/2025 17:37

UCU v members - UCU wins

'The University and College Union has successfully defended claims against it in an Employment Tribunal from two UCU members who claim they had been discriminated against and harassed by the union because of their gender critical beliefs. The case relates to UCU's Edinburgh University branch opposing the showing of the film "Adult Human Female" at the university back in December 2022. The claimants believed this action subjected them to discrimination and harassment. Employment Judge Laidler, sitting with two side members, concluded the claimants were not treated detrimentally contrary to the Equality Act 2010, and that the claimants were not subjected to harassment contrary to the Equality Act. The tribunal ruled that all claims fail and are dismissed.'

https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/14047/Employment-Tribunal-rejects-claims-University-and-College-Union-discriminated-against-members-on-grounds-of-their-gender-critical-beliefs

OP posts:
SinnerBoy · 09/06/2025 17:57

That's got "Appeal" written all over it.

Justme56 · 09/06/2025 18:14

https://x.com/cconcern/status/1932078397162725632?s=46&t=ZX_bLozRqm8etdGICMcAvA

The SC has refused to hear the appeal by Farmor’s School regarding the Kristie Higgs judgement.

https://x.com/cconcern/status/1932078397162725632?s=46&t=ZX_bLozRqm8etdGICMcAvA

duc748 · 09/06/2025 18:17

SinnerBoy · 09/06/2025 17:57

That's got "Appeal" written all over it.

If you're saying an appeal would be a slam-dunk, I'm not so sure about that.

Snowypeaks · 09/06/2025 18:30

SinnerBoy · 09/06/2025 17:57

That's got "Appeal" written all over it.

I agree. From what I recall of the case, UCU did discriminate on grounds of belief and I would have thought that not having your film shown and having your reputation trashed is a detriment. I thought it might fail because of failing to establish that it was UCU directly, or something like that. We'll see.

ArabellaScott · 09/06/2025 19:41

Justme56 · 09/06/2025 18:14

https://x.com/cconcern/status/1932078397162725632?s=46&t=ZX_bLozRqm8etdGICMcAvA

The SC has refused to hear the appeal by Farmor’s School regarding the Kristie Higgs judgement.

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/kristie-higgs-supreme-court-refuses-schools-attempt-to-appeal-landmark-court-of-appeal-win/

More info here.

Kristie Higgs: Supreme Court refuses school’s attempt to appeal landmark Court of Appeal win - Christian Concern

The Supreme Court has today refused to hear the appeal of Farmor’s School in Gloucestershire of the landmark Kristie Higgs Court of Appeal ruling.

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/kristie-higgs-supreme-court-refuses-schools-attempt-to-appeal-landmark-court-of-appeal-win/

OP posts: