I agree.
If I were debating this in Parliament I would say something like this:
"The question as to whether male predators would use self ID to their advantage to gain easier access to potential victims should not be in dispute, since it has already happened on several occasions. The only question, to my mind, is how many times it needs to happen and how many victims need to be harmed before the proponents of self ID admit that this is a real safeguarding issue. However, I can see that our learned friends are not yet ready to confront that issue and so, to avoid getting bogged down discussing that one particular aspect of this debate, I would like to move on from the question of safety, to that of privacy and dignity.
My question is this: how can we make women's spaces inclusive and welcoming of trans women, whilst ensuring that they also remain inclusive and welcoming spaces for women who cannot undress in the presence of the opposite sex for religious reasons, such as Muslim women, and women who have been victims of male violence and whose brains have an inescapable trauma response to seeing a male bodied person in a space where they are vulnerable, even if they agree with the political position that trans women are women? Should these women be forced to self exclude from these spaces if they are unable to use them in the presence of a woman who had a penis, or are their needs also valid and worthy of being accommodated?"