Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The problem with ‘allyship’ schemes at NHS hospitals - The case of the royal free

28 replies

IwantToRetire · 30/08/2023 23:54

A new research note published by Policy Exchange exposes serious issues with ‘allyship schemes’ which have become commonplace across the NHS – with materials promoting gender ideology on display in multiple prominent locations at the Royal Free Hospital – a major NHS teaching hospital in London.
https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/the-problem-with-allyship-schemes-at-nhs-hospitals/

Key Issues
• Materials seen by Policy Exchange – which have been on public display at The Royal Free hospital in London in recent months – including a pop-up banner and posters, act as a case study revealing a variety of issues associated with the activities of staff networks and ‘allyship’ schemes – often influenced by external organisations – which have become commonplace across the NHS in recent years.
• A publicly-accessible noticeboard in the hospital has a document entitled ‘7 Ways to be a good Trans Friend’ (Fig. 4) which tells staff that basic questions such as asking a patient “what is your name?” are inappropriate, posing challenges for staff to conduct routine tasks with patients, such as bringing up their patient records. It also contravenes General Medical Council guidance.
• A banner, seen in a photograph (Fig. 1) which has stood at the entrance of The Royal Free, makes the troubling suggestion that certain members of staff may be ‘safe’ ‘for LGBTQ+ patients to speak to’ on the basis of whether they wear an ‘LGBTQ+ Ally’ badge, setting a damaging precedent in creating a divide between staff who could be deemed ‘safe’/unsafe in providing care for LGBTQ+ patients.
• The wording of the banner is also suggestive of a hierarchy of protected characteristics. Other individuals with protected characteristics may feel that they too should be seen by staff ‘badged’ as culturally sensitive and ‘safe’ for ‘who they are and how they feel’ as a result.
• The lower half of the banner shows staff have made an anti-racist pledge under the ‘See ME First’ scheme which was established at a neighbouring London trust. Yet pledges – that staff should provide quality care regardless of a patient’s background and that fellow staff should be treated with respect – are already enshrined in both equality law and the NHS Constitution for England.
• Both the ‘LGBTQ+ Ally’ and ‘See ME First’ schemes have operated on the basis of staff either making a ‘pledge’ to obtain a badge or lanyard or participating in ‘Allyship Training’ via the staff intranet. No additional qualifications or ongoing assessment are required.
• Another notice (Fig 5) cites a 2018 survey conducted by Stonewall which claims that “1 in 5 LGBT+ people are not out to any healthcare professionals regarding the [sic] sexual orientation when seeking medical attention”. It is not clear why – in almost all cases – it would be appropriate to disclose sexual orientation to a medical professional when seeking ‘general medical care’ unless it was your express personal choice to do so or if it was of clinical relevance.
• Previous Policy Exchange reports have highlighted similar activity throughout the public sector, emerging through staff networks within the police force, and relating to same-sex provision within the NHS
https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/The-Problem-with-Allyship-Schemes-at-NHS-Hospitals.pdf

The problem with ‘allyship’ schemes at NHS hospitals - Policy Exchange

Download Publication Online Reader A new research note published by Policy Exchange exposes serious issues with ‘allyship schemes’ which have become commonplace across the NHS – with materials promoting gender ideology on display in multiple prominent...

https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/the-problem-with-allyship-schemes-at-nhs-hospitals

OP posts:
LoobiJee · 03/09/2023 05:16

FannyCann · 31/08/2023 14:53

OMG. That ally training. THREE HOURS. What on earth can they be talking about for all that time? That's more time than we get for our annual resuscitation training. Even an anaesthetics workshop on conscious sedation was only 2 1/2 hours.
It's just mad.

Also whilst not asking the patient's name I'm pretty sure you aren't meant to ask about their trans status either.

And yet this hospital that failed the rainbow badge assessment was marked down because staff don't routinely ask people their trans status or sexuality. 🤷‍♀️ If anyone asks me if I'm trans I shall feel no shame in telling them to fuck right off.

Funnily enough even my routine greeting "Hello, I'm Fanny, can I just check you are (whatever name is in the notes) and what do you like to be called?" was met with an eye roll and a sharp "My name obviously" by one older lady. I doubt asking her her trans status/sexuality would have gone well.

Notice what that LGBTQ+ ally ship training is focused on? In the order listed on the poster:

“meeting the needs of”
i) colleagues
ii) patients & their loved ones

The legal position on discrimination and harassment should already be covered in the employer-provided EA2010 training covering all nine protected characteristics. A three hour session put on by an internal special interest group led by employees wouldn’t be the appropriate vehicle for the employer to fulfil its EA2010 duties so the “needs” covered in this session must be something else.

I can see how accessibility requirements - access to lifts / ramps / accessible toilet etc - for a colleague who uses a wheelchair would legitimately be described as a “need” (and again that would be the employer’s responsibility to provide). But I find it difficult to see how there are any “needs” relating to sexual orientation in the workplace.

And why is it the staff network telling staff what patients’ needs are, rather than patient groups talking to clinicians about their needs?

PostOpOp · 03/09/2023 07:09

If NHS staff need to wear a badge/lanyard to be someone "safe" then what the hell is the organisation doing training and employing everyone else?!

The NHS undermines the integrity of its own employment practices with allowing this nonsense to happen.

FrancescaContini · 03/09/2023 07:34

Rightsraptor · 31/08/2023 06:56

When you're an inpatient, they constantly ask your name. They have to before any intervention because they might give the antibiotics, blood transfusion whatever to the wrong person if they don't.

How do these idiots imagine this will play out?

"Sorry, we amputated your left leg by mistake because we didn't like to ask your name in case you got upset".

JFC.

😂

God knows what the NHS is thinking of, playing along with this dangerous delusion.

Who pays for the banners and the pamphlets and for the websites to be updated and for people to sit in meetings discussing how hurtful it is to ask a patient their name?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread