Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

As Labour recommits to introducing tougher ‘hate crime’ laws, a new paper highlights the need to protect free speech in the face of trans activists’ pro-censorship demands

31 replies

IwantToRetire · 23/08/2023 00:43

Trans activists’ demands to shutdown dissent is a major threat to free speech.

  • Transgender individuals should be entirely free to identify with their chosen gender – and equally, contrary opinions on trans identity and policy should be debatable.
  • Influential activist groups like Stonewall and Mermaids advocate for gender critical views to be criminalised under ‘hate speech’ laws.
  • Expanding hate speech laws threatens debate on controversial issues such as gender self-identification laws, female-only spaces in hospitals, and single-sex sports.
  • Labour MP Graham Stringer says the paper “skewers the authoritarianism and the irrationality of the transgender ideology” while Conservative MP Nick Fletcher says it is a “much-needed wake-up call to libertarians and conservatives”.

As Labour recommits to introducing tougher ‘hate crime’ laws, a new paper highlights the need to protect free speech in the face of trans activists’ pro-censorship demands.

Marc Glendening, paper author and Head of Cultural Affairs at the free market Institute of Economic Affairs, cites a series of high profile cases to demonstrate that activists “do not aim to win the debate but rather to prevent debate from occurring”, including:

  • Mermaids and Stonewall claiming that opposition to self-identification constitutes ‘hate speech’ and that it should be banned;
  • Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer’s intention to bolster hate crime legislation to make sure “every LGBT+ crime is treated as an aggravated offence,” raising concerns that ‘misgendering’ people could lead to a criminal conviction;
  • Police investigations of individuals for expressing gender critical views under existing public order offence laws and the recording of ‘non-crime hate incidents’;
  • Harassment and threats towards gender critical voices such as Rosie Duffield and attempts to physically prevent gender critical voices from speaking publicly;
  • Preventing medical professionals from providing non-affirming gender identity care under the auspices of banning ‘conversion therapy’.

https://iea.org.uk/media/dont-outlaw-gender-critical-views-says-new-paper/

OP posts:
RealityFan · 24/08/2023 12:42

Sorry if I'm blind here, but...where is all this hate speech, either on the street or online?
I'm not seeing any prejudiced criticism of same sex marriage, all things negative against gays just doesn't exist.

Even so-called transphobic hate speech online, the Nazis that gatecrashed Posie in NZ are a seperate entity unconnected, there is no hate speech from the GC side.

No, this is just a sop to the TRAs who continue to cry wolf about how awful civic society is being to them. Fake news.

No, this is Labour and the managerialist Left wanting to control and dilute discourse and any thoughtful impassioned discussion.

The Left know best. They've decided to champion trans rights above women's rights. The Left know best. They want no more debate or dissent on this. The Left know best. They want you to know that any rocking the boat will be stamped upon by them.

OP posts:
PorcelinaV · 24/08/2023 20:08

Iam really puzzled that any one on FWR should think this hasn't already been happening.

There have been endless threads about women, and other users on social media, being reported for hate speach. Which on investigation turns out to be stating biolgoical facts.

Sure, but what seemed doubtful to me was that organisations would put something in writing that was so obviously against free speech.

SammyScrounge · 14/01/2024 01:35

RebelliousCow · 23/08/2023 16:26

Labour are setting themselves up for a humungous train crash.

How much damage will they have done before we are saved.by that crash?

EdithStourton · 14/01/2024 08:52

I honestly feel as if I have stepped through the looking glass into a completely mad world. We live in a country with an incredible degree of tolerance for diversity: historically speaking, we have never had it so good.

At the same time, we have a huge debt burden and, in a rapidly changing world, atrocious food security. These are issues which should be very high up the list of priorities - and there are plenty of others too, like defence spending, and supporting the less well off, and retaining teachers, and God knows what else.

So what does Labour get its knickers in a twist about? People stating facts about human biology.

Free speech is key in liberal democracies. Labour might want to think what a far right parliament (entirely possible within the next decade or so, look at Europe) might do with any repressive legislation they get onto the statute books if they get in this year. It only takes a statutory instrument....

Fucking MAD. I despise the lot of them.

<Breathes>

EasternStandard · 14/01/2024 08:58

This hate crime stuff is a nail in the coffin for women

We’re in a battle to say no we don’t want gender and all that it does against women

There’s a few ways it can be dealt with. People listen and laws change to our advantage

Politicians pretend it’s not an issue (Starmer keen on that one)

Lastly and worst, changing the law so we can’t even speak up

It would be horrendous. Imagine if we couldn’t post biological facts re a male on here or anywhere, or say it

New posts on this thread. Refresh page