Here's an archive of the article.
https://archive.ph/UQYDC
Rereading it, it's like a first draft. It's all over the place. I don't know why he dragged Hamlet into it. There's casual sexism as well as ageism, why stress 'mostly female'? And 'London based', 'Dublin born', a bit 'you're not from round 'ere'. But when he goes off on the Kitchener poster, I'm not sure he intends it, but it sounds a little supportive. He also mentions the strikes against Glinner, banned from twitter, the WYP (of lesbian nan fame) police warning but shorn of context. Though he is fair enough the bring up the reprehensible 'terf' shooting computer game. He asks what's Graham interest, what's his 'skin in the game' and answers his own question.
I'm not sure this guy has ever really thought about the issue before. I'm probably wrong but I wouldn't be surprised if he's a 'be kind', TRSOH and never had to give it any deeper consideration prior to writing this.