Care to point out the falsehoods in it mishy? Come on. You can just say it is 'excrement' or 'tosh' without engaging with the article, but that just confirms in any new reader's mind that you are incapable of engaging in any thread with any thoughtful contribution.
How about this connection?
“Money was a New Zealand-American psychologist, sexologist and professor at Johns Hopkins University. Regarding ‘the use of explicit sexual pictures’, he wrote in his 1975 book, Sexual Signatures: On Being a Man or a Woman, that they ‘can and should be used as part of a child’s sex education’, and that the best time to introduce sexual content to children is before puberty has begun. ‘Prepubertal children are intellectually capable of understanding sex’, Money wrote. ‘They will no doubt find these pictures erotically stimulating, but as the novelty wears off, they will soon settle down.’”
”Money also recommended that young children watch adults engage in sexual intercourse, and that it should be explained to them as ‘a game adults play’, adding: ‘With guidance, the experience can be integrated into the child’s sex education and serve to reinforce his or her own gender identity.’
Was it false?
What about this:
“In 2018, Australian National University student Sophie Pezzutto – a man who identifies as transgender – travelled to Nevada and California to research pornography for his anthropology PhD. The following year, his research, ‘From Porn Performer to Porntropreneur’, was published by the International Journal of Gender Studies. Pezzutto notes that searches for transgender-themed pornography quadrupled between 2014 and 2017, and that ‘the overwhelming majority of trans porn revolves around trans women’ (that is, men who ‘identify as’ women).”
”Pezzutto also points out that the sex industry provides the revenue for cosmetic surgeries, particularly breast implants for men. ‘A large number of performers interviewed entered the industry at least in part to fund their transition. Sex work was for them a lucrative and, at the same time, empowering avenue to self-actualisation because it provided funds for prohibitively expensive surgeries’, he remarks.”
Was it false?
What about the references to Chu below? False?
“In the following years, Chu would repeatedly reference the influence of pornography on his desire to take female hormones, and even to undergo surgery. In 2012, he told the NYC Trans Oral History Project: ‘[M]y porn addiction had all along been waiting for something like sissy porn… It… demands you to imagine your experience of porn as something that’s turning you into a woman. Not just that you’re looking at people being turned into a woman, but that the act of looking turns you into a woman.’”
”Sissy porn, a shortened form of sissification pornography, is one of several genres that incorporate broader themes of forced feminisation, wherein a man is ostensibly ‘forced’ to transform into a woman, whether through the administration of hormones or the donning of makeup and lingerie.”
I mean. I am very happy to go through these with anyone and discuss how they relate and whether Genevieve has taken a false representation of these people's words and stories. Let's go!
Or, are you just going to scold and leave as per usual?