Speaking here as a fully paid up GC, effectively zero dissent from the fact that female sex based rights are sacrosanct, and any belief that any human can change sex is denying material reality.
I've been fully engaged in the debate for more years than I care to think about, culminating in 2023 where I've decided to pin my colours to the mast on all this.
Initially, the Maya etc court cases, IOC and UCI declarations all made me happier things were changing for the better. Expected Cass Report to spur action.
And seeing the froth and burnt energy on Adam Bryson, Austin Killips, Mika Minio, Sarah Jane Baker, all telling me the ball is being fumbled by the TRA side.
But then I see the absolute kittens that Starmer and the Labour Party are having on any meaningful move to sanity, and knowing they'll soon be the "adults in the room", the lack of movement subject to Maya case, nada from Cass, and 101 other things.
And realising that however much we all want the GRA 2004 to be scrapped and re written to a much tighter script, there'll never be an appetite for this from any party least of all Labour, especially in relation to our ECHR obligations.
And seeing that this act which in 2004 was drafted ostensibly to deal with the 6-10k very sad irredeemably dysphoric individuals at that time to make their life palatable, thru mission creep now mutated and extended in 2023 to likely 500-600k people, mainly men, who want a GRC, likely to be made even wider in scope under a Starmer govt, what, maybe 1m people looking to change gender legally to access all spaces over a decade.
I know how this will go. The parameters will be widened, the requirements will be loosened, certificates provision will be sub contacted to lesser experts than doctors, maybe Stonewall approved therapists.
And that within the first two terms of a Labour govt, there will be in excess of 1m men now legally women, and some the other way.
Yes, there will be tighter control of men in women's elite sport, but none at amateur parkrun level. There will be tighter control of men in women's jails, but none in refuges.
And the chance of anyone at Primark, or my local gym, or the WI, or lesbian clubs/dating sites, demanding let alone being able to/regularly or even simply actually check GRCs at the door of changing rooms, refuges, social settings, internet groups, is precisely between 0 and 0.000.
So, yes, there will be progess in the most visible of situations...prisons, sports. But none elsewhere. Upwards of 1m will apply for GRCs, certainly by the time Starmer's changes kick in over his second term. And many more men who'll show women the middle finger on being asked for a non existent GRC.
I truly believe this is the reality that will crash like a dull thud towards decades end.
And despite being a GC up for the fight, I fail to see anything that can stop this inevitability. And I feel so badly for girls and women cast asunder on the altar of progressive politics.