Beetle, I should have said that it was from Spectator World which is the US version.
As a general point Spectator World seems to be doing a good job in filling a needed gap in US media. I don't know what readership figures are, but they produce some good right-of-centre/socially conservative reporting which provides proper balance to newspapers like the New York Times. A bit like five or six years ago when James Kirkup's articles in the UK edition started the trickle of intelligent questioning of the gender explosion within MSM.
It is good to see the start of a rational fight back in the US. I thought that the point about children was a good one, and may go some way to explain the level of emotion in the US, where the debate started later and more ordinary parents will be aware of the damage done. (Five years ago we were having dinner with an ordinary mid-West couple. The mother was a teacher and she was astonished when I said something terfy. She would not be able to say anything similar even though she agreed with me completely, and then told me about some completely inappropriate inclusion of a boy in the girls changing room that the school had been forced to accept.) I also thought the suggestion that much of the pressure has come from the need of lobby groups to keep the funds rolling in is interesting. Related to the usual big Pharma argument, but perhaps the start of an awareness that like Stonewall these "charities" are accountable only to themselves and are perhaps not serving the needs of the LGB communities they were set up to support.