Ive been having a "discussion" with someone on social media, who claims that the word "woman" is just a social construct and describes someone's gender which means it can be used to describe anyone who identifies as one as gender is just how someone feels . The scientific word is female. Im quite confused now. I asked him what the word for a group of adult human females that didnt include adult human males was, and his reply was ciswomen. Can someone explain this to me? Is "woman" a gender?
Feminism: Sex & gender discussions
midgemadgemodge · 02/06/2023 08:32
Historically the term means adult human female and therefore isn't a description of gender
Feminine or lady-like was traditionally used to describe the the gender
Words do change however
But there is a problem where law uses the old sense and people try to use the new sense within the context of law
zibzibara · 02/06/2023 08:48
The only reason that "woman" has been redefined by some people is to appease men who desire to be women. This whole concept of "gender identity" comes from people desiring to be something they can never be: the opposite sex. It's an attempt to work around reality by using linguistic trickery.
JacquelinePot · 02/06/2023 09:24
Not to derail, but "Gender identity" comes from John Money. A mid 20th century's doctor who performed experiments on children. His hypothesis being that one's understanding of oneself as being female or male is determined by the social role one is given by those around them.
He believed that you can make a boy a girl (and vice versa) if you tell them they are, dress them, give them toys and encourage behaviour stereotypically associated with the opposite sex. And of course create facsimile opposite sex genitals.
His most famous experiment on the Reimer twins ended in one suicide and one death by drug overdose.
The book As Nature Made Him is an excellent but harrowing account.
All of this nonsense is based on the abuse and lies work of this man.
zibzibara · 02/06/2023 08:48
The only reason that "woman" has been redefined by some people is to appease men who desire to be women. This whole concept of "gender identity" comes from people desiring to be something they can never be: the opposite sex. It's an attempt to work around reality by using linguistic trickery.
zibzibara · 02/06/2023 10:01
Thanks for the correction! I'd read about Money and his experiment on the Reimer twins but didn't know he'd coined "gender identity" as well. Makes it an even worse concept then, when considering it in its original context.
JacquelinePot · 02/06/2023 09:24
Not to derail, but "Gender identity" comes from John Money. A mid 20th century's doctor who performed experiments on children. His hypothesis being that one's understanding of oneself as being female or male is determined by the social role one is given by those around them.
He believed that you can make a boy a girl (and vice versa) if you tell them they are, dress them, give them toys and encourage behaviour stereotypically associated with the opposite sex. And of course create facsimile opposite sex genitals.
His most famous experiment on the Reimer twins ended in one suicide and one death by drug overdose.
The book As Nature Made Him is an excellent but harrowing account.
All of this nonsense is based on the abuse and lies work of this man.
zibzibara · 02/06/2023 08:48
The only reason that "woman" has been redefined by some people is to appease men who desire to be women. This whole concept of "gender identity" comes from people desiring to be something they can never be: the opposite sex. It's an attempt to work around reality by using linguistic trickery.
SpringNotSprung · 02/06/2023 08:43
Sex is what a person is: XX male, XY female.
Gender is what a person identifies as and nowadays there is a huge variation.
I identify as a heterosexual woman because it's what I am, increasingly this is described by others as cis.
People can identify as what they like in my opinion, provided they do no harm. If they want to identify as a green spotted monkey or woman, if they were born male, that's equally fine. If they want to dress up as a woman to mislead and do harm, and vice versa, that's not fine. The two are quite different.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.