In case anyone is interested, I replied to Tate Visitor Comms in early June (copy of email below). Have had no response, and have not heard a peep from Tate Kids.
‘Dear Adam
I've heard nothing from Tate Kids, so am copying them in here.
I find your response at best disingenuous. The article strenuously avoids using the words ’she’ or ‘her’; and it states that ‘We’re not totally sure’ of the answer to ‘Was Marlow Male, or Female? Or neither?’ None of this particularly accords with your claim that Tate isn’t making 'an attempt to retrospectively assign any specific form of identity’.
It would be perfectly possible to discuss issues of gender identity and its context – how Marlow Moss dressed and styled her hair, the fact that her name is not obviously a masculine or a feminine one, how society viewed/still views that etc – without using the meaningless ’they’ when discussing someone who was a woman, or saying – untruthfully – that no one is sure of her sex.
My decision not to renew my membership next year has not changed.
Thanks
MarkWithaC’