@4plusthehound I have read Sapiens. He puts forward the settled agriculture theory that has been discussed upthread and it makes a lot of sense. I got a bit frustrated with that section though because it is by its prehistoric nature unknowable, and he talked about a lot that was unverifiable. Like one PP said, it shouldn’t be up to feminism to point to the perfect prelapsarian state and say “found it!” but to build it in today’s world.
Having said that, there has since been published a graphic-novel version of Sapiens in two volumes, aimed at YA, which I recently read and found better than the original! There the idea of pre agricultural societies is explored in more depth and compared more to some societies today, with more speculation about matriarchy and cooperation (cooperation being important to evolution too). It’s a fascinating read, I recommend it. Fun to read!
From there I tend to go with others who have linked sex and class oppression with hoarding of resources.
I also agree biology is important- it needn’t be 100% determinant but it’s an uphill struggle and you need laws, technology and societal cooperation for biology not to be ultimately detrimental to women’s achievement of fully realised lives. The focus on nuclear families without outside help disables women once you have kids.
As I get older I also subscribe to the “grandmother hypothesis” - once you are past childbearing and have been around a while, you are more useful to the tribe as a holder of wisdom. Some men tend not to like this…