I think there is a huge difference between the "female impersonators" whose history is from pantomime theatre. Very different from drag with its at best "night club" humour, and more recently the obvious over sexualisation of the performance.
The pantomime dames etc., were sometimes a bit risky, and you could say a way of making fun of what were perceived as female behaviour. And even as a child I did cringe a bit.
But Lily Savage (there may be others) really did seem like a tribute to women, and sadly in a way, loved by women because Lily got to say what a lot of women wouldn't dare.
And it did seem to be done with a lot of affection.
Current drag doesn't have that history. It is far more crude and sexualised. ie a corruption of that art to allow men with pervy ideas about sex, and some of whom seem to want to use this "art form" to influence children.
I think it would help to have different words to describe the very sexualised drag, from the gay club acts, and the "female impersonators".
I know Lily Savage made me laugh and at first thought I shouldn't but did allow myself as I did feel it wasn't about disrespecting women. But I never thought it was drag and I dont think it was called that.
We need to hang on to words and phrases that are real, not allow young people who have been conned because they are ignorant, that they are all the same (any more than sex and gender are the same thing).