Yes, worth looking at all the details and possible blind spots .
WRT police, there is this enquiry, in the wake of Carrick:
www.gov.uk/government/news/angiolini-inquiry-to-investigate-david-carrick
'Alongside the Angiolini Inquiry, the government has commissioned His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, Fire and Rescue Services to conduct a rapid review of all forces’ response to the inspectorate’s recent report into vetting and counter-corruption. This will make sure Chief Officers are taking the necessary action to remove those who are not fit to serve. The NPCC is asking all forces to conduct a data-washing exercise of their staff against the Police National Database to check for sexual violence and domestic abuse markers on case files.
The Home Secretary has also launched an internal review into police dismissals to make sure the system is effective at removing officers who fall short of the standards expected of them.'
Women's Aid response, from the Times article:
'Farah Nazeer, chief executive at Women’s Aid, said the measures need to go further. “At a time when the police response to violence against women and girls is a public priority, it is positive to see the government step up efforts to co-ordinate action to tackle it.
“These measures, however, need to create the systemic change needed to keep women safe, and fail to hold any agency to account. The regular publication of data on police responses to violence against women and girls, as well as the Home Office monitoring of police compliance to existing standards, such as the Istanbul Convention, would be an important start.”'