I was just listening to a radio presenter talk about how he did a phone-in on Adam Graham/Isla Bryson and he said on air he wouldn’t use female pronouns for him. Also that they had lots of trans callers who said he shouldn’t be in a women’s prison.
And I just thought, how are you doing anything different to him? He transitions to get where he shouldn’t be - a women’s prison and you get to go where you shouldn’t be - the women’s toilets. Regardless of your motivation, you’re still violating women’s boundaries. The scale and impact is just different. Now obviously I’m not saying that men using women’s public loos is the same as men being in women’s prisons, that is so so horrific and at least women could leave the loo. But I just thought the underlying principle was the same. I wish he’d followed it up with “but do you use female spaces?”
People say “I’m not using female pronouns for a rapist”. Which I agree with. But why do you have to use female pronouns for any man? You have no idea of their motivation. Why is he not a woman but another man does deserve to have female pronouns? Every situation is that a man has decided that, on his say so, he should be called she.