Good for him for challenging yet another biased and inaccurate report from the captured Guardian. His letter clearly highlights how they framed issues :
"your article overemphasises the long waiting list and underemphasises that it was a waiting list for the wrong treatment, as Cass makes clear"
"A clinician you quote says some staff left the Gender Identity Development Service (Gids) “in a destructive way”. They did not – they raised serious concerns with their managers which resulted in their intimidation. These concerns were borne out by the Cass review"
"Your article makes no reference to the growing group of detransitioners – those who regret the irreversible damage done and feel that their “treatment” was based on ideology, not appropriate clinical concern"
Thank heavens for people with integrity like David Bell. If it was left to rags like the Guardian, there's be no saving children from this ideology.