Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Scotland Tonight, that SPS Woman.

23 replies

Mochudubh · 25/01/2023 22:56

Fuck me. How does she sleep at night.

Sorry, about to go to bed, but I was literally shouting at the telly with her disingenuous shite.

I know this makes no sense to anyone who didn't see it but I am incandescent with rage.

Going to bed now.

OP posts:
yestheyhavethesamedad · 25/01/2023 23:30

I actually rewound it and wrote down word for word what she said whilst shouting at the telly

yestheyhavethesamedad · 26/01/2023 00:20

Transcript of conversation for those that cannot watch it , rona dougall started by saying gordon cree interviewing fiona cruikshank head of operations of prisons , about the very SMALL number of transwoman in prison

Gordon Cree : why would it be that someone that is biologically male and who has been convicted of rape , would be taken to a womans prison?

Fiona Cruikshank: So any transgender person who is admitted into custody, is admitted into the establishment that matches their identified gender, that they were living in within the community.

GC: so at the moment does the prison service look for a gender recognition certificate or is it just how the prisoner chooses how to identify themselves?

FC : It's how they choose to identify and how they have been living in the community.

GC: Do u understand why people will be concerned about that , particularly in the case of sex offenders?

FC: Absolutely , however there is a robust risk assessment process , that the prison service will go thru. So just because someone has been admitted into a particular prison does not mean that will be their prison of allocation following that risk assessment .

GC: So essentially once the risk assessment has taken place , what factors are looked at there?

FC: So em , we consider a number of factors , so we have to balance the welfare , the needs and the rights of the individual themself, as well as the welfare and safety of others around them.
Em , so shortly after admission we will conduct a multi disciplinary case conference and em carry out a risk assessment.
So factors we consider are the identified gender of the individual, how they were living in the community , WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL THEMSELVES WANT TO BE PLACED. We will also consider criminal history .

So that will look at their index offence , their previous convictions and we will take into considerations any risk factors that may pose a threat to individuals of a particular gender, we will also consider any pre sentencing reports that are available , and again look at the risk factors , and any particular groups that may be at risk.

Em, we will also consider the mental health of the individual and if their mental health will be exarcerbated or negatively impacted if placed within a particular area, em and we will consider the safety of the individual themself, so have they been the subject of any gender based violence .

GC: Could it every be the case that a biological male , who is choosing to identify as a woman and it appears in some cases that all it takes , them choosing to , that has used their penis to rape a woman , could ever be in a situation where they come into contact with female prisoners in the prison system , could that happen ?

FC: em It could , but only following a robust risk assessment , em so if we feel someone poses a particular risk , then we have the opportuniry to keep them seperate from the general population , until that risk assessment is done.
If the decision is then made to integrate into the main stream and associate with OTHER woman , then that would be done in a very slow and staged process .It would be monitored and supervised very closely and would be reviewed regularly.

GC: Back in 2019 when the concerns were raised about the way transgender prisoners were being placed in womans prisons , stv was told by scottish prison service that the policy and the way it happens was being reviewed. Has that review taken place , have things changed in that time or are we using the same guidance ?

FC: The em ,gender reassignment policy has been reviewed and its just going thru the final stages at the moment , before thats then published.

GC: I guess to some extend , a lot of these decisions are about how you manage sex offenders in the prison system , rather than it being specifically about transgender people.

FC: I can't speak about individual cases , but when we look at someones criminal history in terms of index offence and previous convictions, then if they have been convicted of a sex offence and previous convictions , then if they have been convicted of a sex offence, and there are obvious risks associated with that , that will be taken into consideration during the risk assessment .

GC: Does that mean they would stay in isolation or does it mean they would go into a male prison

FC: em, each case would be decided on an individual basis , based on the specific risks to the individual and from that individual .

Cheekymaw · 26/01/2023 00:27

What an absolute drip. Beggars belief. Shameful

PriOn1 · 26/01/2023 06:10

we consider a number of factors , so we have to balance the welfare , the needs and the rights of the individual themself, as well as the welfare and safety of others around them.
Em , so shortly after admission we will conduct a multi disciplinary case conference and em carry out a risk assessment.
So factors we consider are the

-identified gender of the individual (ripe for being lied about)
-how they were living in the community (are there robust checks on this, or is this another area for lying?)
-WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL THEMSELVES WANT TO BE PLACED (just stupid and of no relevance in a “risk assessment”.

We will also consider criminal history Finally something relevant!

So that will look at their index offence , their previous convictions and we will take into considerations any risk factors that may pose a threat to individuals of a particular gender (wording Indicates capture) we will also consider any pre sentencing reports that are available , and again look at the risk factors , and any particular groups that may be at risk.

-Em, we will also consider the mental health of the individual (ripe for more lying)and
-if their mental health will be exarcerbated or negatively impacted if placed within a particular area, (ripe for lying)em and we will consider
-the safety of the individual themself, so have they been the subject of any gender based violence (actual factual convictions against others, or is this another place they are taking his word for it?)

This does not remotely sound like a robust risk assessment and appears to be heavily weighted in favour of the perpetrator, who has opportunity after opportunity to lie to get what he wants.

Mochudubh · 26/01/2023 08:41

@yestheyhavethesamedad

Thank you so much for transcribing that. It beggars belief that anyone, let alone a woman, can spout all that with a straight face.

I was literally shouting "but the risk assessment is done on the basis they are a woman, not a MALE FUCKING CONVICTED RAPIST.

(I am just as angry reading that again as I was last night)

At least it's out there now in the sun. I wonder if that interview will give anyone in the SPS or SG a moment's pause to consider that might not be the best message to be sending the public, but I won't hold my breath.

OP posts:
Mochudubh · 26/01/2023 09:11

Very good summary of the whole debate at the link below

news.stv.tv/scotland/ex-prison-governor-says-trans-rapist-isla-bryson-should-not-be-in-prison-at-all-female-cornton-vale

OP posts:
Shelefttheweb · 26/01/2023 09:27

how they were living in the community

They were RAPING WOMEN when they lived in the community!!!

yestheyhavethesamedad · 26/01/2023 09:44

When you see it written down , you reallise how insane it is , and for all those online , saying they are in segregation , they clearly state that at some point they will be in general population , and the female prisoners have no choice

nilsmousehammer · 26/01/2023 09:53

All this careful risk assessment and gradual staged approaches had bugger all impact in protecting Karen White's victims, didn't they?

And yes, wholly agree Sheleft. How was this individual 'living in the community'? By raping women. Violent, injuring, life destroying sexual assaults for pleasure upon women.

And that male will never have to lay a finger on a woman in a locked prison area in order to intimidate, harass, have power and cause fear. Which, with a history of sexual offending, will be some of what that offender gets off on.

Women are not fucking sex toys or therapeutic resources for males.

BovrilMartini · 26/01/2023 09:55

All that effort and waste of time in the very over stretched prison service as opposed to just saying ‘Man, male prison’

Kernackered · 26/01/2023 10:10

It reminds of when you introduce new horses to an established group. You keep them fenced separately but within eyesight to see if they are hoping to attack each other. These women are being treated like animals

Shelefttheweb · 26/01/2023 11:21

yestheyhavethesamedad · 26/01/2023 09:44

When you see it written down , you reallise how insane it is , and for all those online , saying they are in segregation , they clearly state that at some point they will be in general population , and the female prisoners have no choice

It has also become clear - segregation means in the segregated unit with other women

Shelefttheweb · 26/01/2023 11:22

Argh! No ‘other’ about it! In a segregated unit with women.

IcakethereforeIam · 26/01/2023 11:26

What about the mental health of the much greater number of women that he will be placed among? Is that robustly risk assessed?

Winniepoo · 26/01/2023 11:31

Crime: sex offence
Sex: Male
Eligible for womens prison: No

This is the only risk assessment needed!

Shelefttheweb · 26/01/2023 11:37

If a serial rapists is not excluded, then who would be? (Bearing in mind anyone with mental health reasons for committing such a crime would be in a secure hospital like Carstairs)

IcakethereforeIam · 26/01/2023 11:37

Actually, @Winniepoo that's could be even simpler

Sex: Male
Eligible for Women's Prison: No

Idc if he's only in for littering.

IcakethereforeIam · 26/01/2023 11:38

Feck *that

WinnieFosterReads · 26/01/2023 11:43

What about the impact on the female prisoners? What about the impact on the female prison staff? Where are their risk assessments?
The prison unions should be all over this. Someone should take a test case to an employment tribunal and a female prisoner (preferably with an additional protected characteristic of faith or disability) should take it to the ECHR.

Hadalifeonce · 26/01/2023 11:48

I don't know if it's the same now, but convicted paedophiles were kept away from other prisoners in male prisons for their own safety. Why can't those rules be applied to these men if they fear violence in male prisons? It's a male problem let them sort it out between themselves.

Shelefttheweb · 26/01/2023 11:52

WinnieFosterReads · 26/01/2023 11:43

What about the impact on the female prisoners? What about the impact on the female prison staff? Where are their risk assessments?
The prison unions should be all over this. Someone should take a test case to an employment tribunal and a female prisoner (preferably with an additional protected characteristic of faith or disability) should take it to the ECHR.

Someone did a judicial review about legality but it was ruled it was lawful to house men in women’s prisons. I don’t know if anyone has done a sex discrimination claim though.

JustWaking · 26/01/2023 13:04

From the factors they say they consider, it seems that the only risk being assessed is the risk to the male prisoner, with no thought to the risk to any of the women in the same prison. They're women so they're less important than the men, of course. Sure they won't mind

It really reminds me of some of the Equality impact assessments we've seen, where they consider only the intersection rather than considering the impact on people with those characteristics whose needs are in conflict.

Eg when considering allowing men to use female changing rooms, when considering Disability, they might say 'there's an access ramp to the women's changing room, so there' s no negative impact for the man ' instead of recognising that whilst there are 3 cubicles, none of them is large enough for a wheelchair so disabled women have no choice but to change in the common area of the changing room. And 'religion' just gets a 'no impact' Confused

Winniepoo · 26/01/2023 14:32

IcakethereforeIam · 26/01/2023 11:37

Actually, @Winniepoo that's could be even simpler

Sex: Male
Eligible for Women's Prison: No

Idc if he's only in for littering.

Haha, Oh my word you are right!! What was I thinking I am too verbose!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread