Bancroft’s work, sometimes criticised for being too inclusive and easily applied to any man,
woah - I think anyone making that criticism is telling on themselves. I actually read it during a phase about 2 years into my relationship when we were arguing a lot and I was starting to wonder if the foundations were wobbly - but I could not see my partner in any of his portraits. I was quite ready to!
Controlling men hate that there is a space where women can talk to each other and offer support to each other. Nothing poses a more direct threat to their control and manipulation than women speaking to each other. The sisterly support can clear the fog of male abuse so that the woman recognise it for what it is.
now doesn't that explain a lot?
Inspired by this brilliant but grim piece, can I be wildly and insanely optimistic for a moment?
If we are seeing the patterns and behaviours of domestic abuse shift from the private, individual sphere to the public collective sphere, does that also mean that the abusers are effectively doing feminist consciousness raising? A lot of us have had feminist awakenings thanks to the trans rights movement. A lot of us have developed a much deeper understanding of misogyny and the ways in which it operates. Why, only today LRM, and Rosie Duffield jointly have helped raise public awareness of abusive male behaviours another notch.
Men have always oppressed women by preventing us from speaking about what happens to us. But now it's not just happening to us individually. It's happening to us collectively, and it can't be hidden by shaming women out of speaking. They're showing everyone the man behind the curtain; they're making the actual mechanisms of female oppression and the logic of male entitlement more and more explicit. If this doesn't end in a Woke Taliban, maybe it will end in a feminism that can't be shamed into retreat in the next generation.
or maybe I'm high on unicorn juice or something.