But lots and lots of children are waiting for things from the NHS. 2 years to see a physio here for severs disease. Reading it makes it seem like the only children waiting for NHS help are these kids.
The other things that struck me was the argument about legal professionals, including judges not being suitable to make healthcare decisions. It happens all of the time. Look at Archie Battersbee, his medical care was decided by the courts.
There is a breathtaking ability to make it seem as though everyone is out to get trans kids and these issues only affect trans kids. If they really want to effect change, they'd be arguing for shorter waiting lists for all children for all conditions. Or that it is never right from the judiciary to get involved in children's healthcare cases, ever.
And yy to the woeful lack of participants in the study. I immediately thought that one child could potentially have 2 parents completing the survey, maybe a step parent, maybe an aunt or uncle, maybe a grandparent. So one child's experience is amplified 2/3/4/6 times. That's not addressed in the methodology, is it? There's no list of questions for us to see either...