Although I'm being critical, this is definitely worth listening to, and I think many of my criticisms are as a result of the journalist going well out of her way to minimise claims of partiality against her, which I suspect she knows would comes as abuse and aggression.
3 episodes of 30-40 minutes is something I was able to slot into a couple of days quite nicely.
The journalist is upfront that it's not really possible for her to ask probing questions of the young people identifying as trans. She doesn't say it but it's clear it's because she, probably correctly, perceives them as being incredibly fragile. So you end up with her saying this kind of thing about a young transwoman:
"Steph is somewhere between male and female. If you imagine a sliding scale with male at zero and female at 100 Step says that they are a 75 or maybe an 80 so a bit on the feminine side". [My comment: Steph seems to be one of the massive wave of ROGD males who found their trans identity online. This happened simultaneously for Steph and two transboys on a Minecraft server.]
Other stuff isn't challenged. For example Polly Carmichael's second-in-command at the Tavistock, Bernadette Wren, said children on the waiting list for the Tavistock (I assume this was GIDS) killed themselves. A claim like this really have led to a request for further details.
There was one statistic that particularly caught my ear, that 1050 children (under 16s) were referred for puberty blockers. They were out of 19125 that "went to the Tavi", just over 1 in 20. It wasn't clear whether she meant "went to GIDS at the Tavi", which I assume she did.
Polly Carmichael was treated gently but even so, or maybe because of it, gave a rather damning account of herself. She needs to be in a court facing charges. But I think I detected a difference in tone between her and Bernadette Wren. In terms of presentation, I think that Carmichael believes she can bluff it out while Wren seems to be more worried about being held accountable.
But I do feel that in the interests of impartiality, the journalist seemed to be continually backing away from the red flashing lights indicating that many things were horribly wrong. But at least you could tell that she is deeply troubled but much of what she's found and although perhaps she'd like to be onboard with the ideology, her doubts are causing her a real problem with that.
There is one glaring omission. There's been no talk about detransitioners. (Possibly mentioned in passing but I heard nothing of substance.) The journalist's style is to continually ask what she considers to be the key questions. I'm waiting to hear her ask this: What happens if a child wrecks their body and then spends a lifetime in anguish over what they've done to themselves? And how should people be held accountable? I'm hoping this will be in the next episode.