LosingTheWill2022 · Today 09:18
^PlatypusRock · Today 06:05
The reason I don’t like it (biggest tom
boy ever) is because yet again a man is taking over a space for women.^
Whilst I can understand your viewpoint @PlatypusRock, I am not comfortable with including clothing to define a "space for women". I accept that is not what you are arguing and that your issue is with the role of the model, but I think it is an inevitable consequence which has the potential to undermine a gender critical stance.
IMO you have put that point across well Losing, expressed it in a pleasant and reasonable way.
I personally don’t think many men will ever want to wear dresses though, or not in the same way that women want to wear trousers. The functions of men and women’s clothes are so different.
I don’t believe exchanging clothes will get rid of stereotypes of masculinity and femininity either . If James Bond wore a silk slip it would be to exaggerate masculinity by contrast.
You could iron out all visible outward differences in children and some teens by dressing them the same way but it wouldn’t last.
Masculinity still symbolises strength, freedom, ability to move and act. So Starmer or Sunak wanting to wear a dress. is not going to happen as a ‘GC’ preference. For them to wear a dress and high heels would not make much sense anyway. It is more uncomfortable and restrictive than what they wear.
In my opinion it would make more sense for Liz Truss or Suella say to wear a warm, comfortable, grey, man’s suit. Think what trouble it would save. It is odd that if they did so they would be unpopular. But maybe they, and the public, see looking ‘feminine’ as natural and expected. I believe it may well be part of human nature to express a difference through clothes..