Ultimately, however, there is a cold hard truth - it is infinitely easier to ensure Mrs Harrison comes to no harm by having her limit where she goes, than it is to make sure she comes to no harm by making sure that none of the misogynistic men who live within 20 miles of her house are out and about when she goes for a run.
This is precisely what I mean: the choices for dealing with the problem of male violence are presented as a binary that unquestioningly prioritises risk elimination over autonomy. I’m sure this wasn’t meant, but I find the turn of phrase “having her limit where she goes” paternalistic. It suggests a control over Mrs Harrison. The third way is: present Mrs Harrison with all the facts and let her decide. While continuing to combat the violent behaviour of men.