Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sarah Phillimore update article on the Social Work England case

7 replies

ChristinaXYZ · 18/10/2022 15:07

sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/social-work-england-and-its-views

OP posts:
Janeaustensquill · 18/10/2022 15:56

Delighted that SWE have dropped the case - and that SarAh is highlighting their shoddy behaviour:

”What does matter, very much, is that the regulator for the social work profession decided to take over 2 years to investigate a social worker for what - I now assume they concede - was the lawful exercise of her protected political speech and manifestation of her protected belief. It is instructive to note that the SW received particular criticism for her concern about the operation of the charity Mermaids - concerns now echoed in the Houses of Parliament and calls for a police investigation.

Social workers have an extremely important role in our society; they are obliged to safeguard vulnerable adults and children. To tell them that any individual, organisation or political ideology is exempt from criticism - and what is worse, that you will risk your job and your professional reputation if you dare - places a wholly unacceptable fetter on a social worker’s safeguarding obligations, a foundation of the profession.

If SWE is not willing now to reflect and clarify its position, and reassure its registrants - and I appreciate that these proceedings were not the arena for that exercise - then I hope it will be soon. Social work is far too important to allow itself to be captured by any one ideology, and particularly not that of ‘gender identity expression’ which puts at risk the dignity and safety of women, and encourages children and young people into irreversible medical interventions, on the basis of very scanty evidence indeed.

The Fitness to Practice hearing was arranged to protect the public and the reputation of the profession. It is ironic that it turned out not to be the SW who should have been under scrutiny, but her captured regulator.”

LaughingPriest · 18/10/2022 23:24

Thanks for the link, OP.

stealtheatingtunnocks · 18/10/2022 23:28

Bloody awful.

she was a real life Cassandra

ResisterRex · 19/10/2022 07:01

Bumping as I just read this as it must've been awful for the social worker. I don't see it getting much news coverage because they walked away but when you read the detail, it's chilling.

Perhaps when the Cass Review reports (which is when?) this social worker's case might be one of those little boxes the Mail puts in its longer articles IYSWIM.

KatMcBundleFace · 19/10/2022 07:15

I'm slightly confused about this.
SWE wanted to drop the case (after discriminating against this person for 2 years) but am I right in thinking, the SW and team wanted the case to go ahead, to show how ridiculous the Mccarthism was?
I'm glad this is going to an employment tribunal and will be getting out my spade.

Janeaustensquill · 20/10/2022 16:55

Me too!!

RoyalCorgi · 20/10/2022 16:58

If SWE and the social worker's employer have any sense, they will settle before tribunal. How can they possibly win? The high court made a very clear ruling in the Forstater case. Since then we have had Mermaids being investigated by the Charities Commission and the closure of the GIDS clinic.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page